December 12, 2024 05:52 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Donald Trump vows to eliminate birthright citizenship after taking charge | No alliance with Congress in Delhi polls: AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal | Bengaluru techie's suicide: Atul Subhash's wife and her family booked | Bengaluru techie's suicide: Atul Subhash's wife and her family booked | INDIA bloc to knock on Supreme Court's doors over alleged EVM manipulation during Maharashtra polls | 'Babri Masjid should be rebuilt in Bengal's Murshidabad': TMC MLA Humayun Kabir sparks row | Rajnath Singh calls on Russian Prez Vladimir Putin in Moscow, discusses bilateral defence cooperation | Police to investigate conspiracy angle in Mumbai bus accident that killed 7 | Mamata Banerjee should lead INDIA bloc: Lalu Prasad Yadav | Opposition moves no-confidence motion against VP Jagdeep Dhankar in RS

Compensation for sexual harassment not taxable : IT Tribunal on Sushmita Sen case

| @indiablooms | Nov 20, 2018, at 04:02 pm

Mubai, Nov 20 (IBNS) :The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that no tax liability arises over compensation received by a victim of sexual harassment, reported News18.

This ruling was delivered by the quasi-judicial body while hearing the tax-related case of actor Sushmita Sen.

The actor had received Rs. 95 lakh as part of the settlement with the beverage company, Coca-Cola in 2003-04. She had alleged sexual harassment by one of the company’s employees. The Tribunal had marked the compensation as a “capital receipt” for Sushmita Sen and thus could not be taxed like an income.

The actor, who has played roles in blockbuster Bollywood movies like Main Hoon Na and was crowned Miss Universe in 1994 at the age of 18, had entered into a promotional deal with Coca-Cola worth Rs 1.5 crore. However, the contract ended prematurely and she got Rs 1.45 crore from Coca-Cola as the final settlement for sexual harassment allegations.

But the actor only showed Rs 50 lakh as income and the rest as capital gains.

Concurring with this, the Tribunal stated, “The only logical deduction was that the company accepted the contention of the assessee of the alleged sexual harassment and paid the compensation to avoid negative publicity/embarrassment which would have jeopardised the business of the company world over. The additional compensation was not towards the service rendered and did not arise out of the contractual terms.”

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.