September 02, 2026 01:14 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
CJP calls off Sept 5 Delhi march after Supreme Court quashes FIRs against protesters | ‘Dismantle entire terror ecosystem’: Modi’s strong message at SCO Summit in Shehbaz’s presence | Modi’s big appeal after 7.8% GDP growth: ‘Don’t travel abroad, avoid destination weddings’ | Modi-Pezeshkian talks: Iran seeks India’s 'extensive contacts' to end West Asia war | Indus Waters Treaty row: India rejects Hague court order, says ‘no jurisdiction’ over its sovereign decisions | India beats the odds with 7.8% GDP growth; PM Modi has a message for critics | PM Modi meets Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian during SCO summit in Kyrgyzstan | ‘Islam superior to all religions’: Karnataka minister’s remark sparks BJP-Congress war; resignation demand grows | PM Modi meets Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian during SCO summit in Kyrgyzstan | VHP breaks silence on Durga Puja ‘guidelines’: No blanket non-veg ban, clarifies stand on theme pandals amid backlash
Excise Policy
Photo courtesy: Facebook/Arvind Kejriwal

Delhi excise policy case: Arvind Kejriwal moves sessions court challenging ACMM summons

| @indiablooms | Mar 15, 2024, at 12:35 am

New Delhi/UNI: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Thursday moved the sessions court challenging the summons issued to him by Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) Court, which directed him to appear before it on March 16 on the Enforcement Directorate (ED) complaint over the non-compliance of summons in the money laundering case related to the alleged excise policy case.

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) Divya Malhotra earlier after hearing the submissions on behalf of Enforcement Directorate (ED) took cognizance of the complaint and listed the matter for appearance of Kejriwal on Saturday.

Counsel for ED had submitted that the Assistant Director, ED issued summons dated 12.01.2024, 31.01.2024 and 14.02.2024 to the proposed accused "to give evidence in connection with the investigation or proceedings under PMLA in pursuance of his powers under Section 50(2), PMLA. He is a public servant within the meaning of Section 21, IPC by virtue of Section 40,PMLA."

The summonses were addressed to the respondent/proposed accused at his official e-mail address and the delivery of such summonses is prima facie evidence from the fact that the proposed accused sent replies to them.

The government counsel submitted that as per the mandate of Section 50(3) of the Act, the respondent/proposed accused was legally bound to comply with the summons but allegedly he failed to do so.

He said this is the second complaint against the same person with the similar allegations and every non-compliance of the summons issued by a public servant would tantamount to a separate offence.

It is submitted that Kejriwal has been issued eight summons in the case. ED had earlier filed a complaint case against Kejriwal for not complying with the initial three summons issued to him which is also listed on March 16.

The Enforcement Directorate has alleged that the excise policy was implemented as part of a conspiracy to give wholesale business profit of 12 percent to certain private companies.

The ED has alleged that the accused were in touch with Kejriwal regarding the preparation of the Excise policy for 2021-22.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.