December 12, 2024 04:41 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Donald Trump vows to eliminate birthright citizenship after taking charge | No alliance with Congress in Delhi polls: AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal | Bengaluru techie's suicide: Atul Subhash's wife and her family booked | Bengaluru techie's suicide: Atul Subhash's wife and her family booked | INDIA bloc to knock on Supreme Court's doors over alleged EVM manipulation during Maharashtra polls | 'Babri Masjid should be rebuilt in Bengal's Murshidabad': TMC MLA Humayun Kabir sparks row | Rajnath Singh calls on Russian Prez Vladimir Putin in Moscow, discusses bilateral defence cooperation | Police to investigate conspiracy angle in Mumbai bus accident that killed 7 | Mamata Banerjee should lead INDIA bloc: Lalu Prasad Yadav | Opposition moves no-confidence motion against VP Jagdeep Dhankar in RS
Kashmir
Image Credit: UNI

Kashmir: After a halt for over 10 years, HC allows Nadimarg Kashmiri Pandit massacre trial

| @indiablooms | Oct 29, 2022, at 11:01 pm

Srinagar/UNI: The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court Saturday allowed the revision petition of J&K Police in the 2003 Nadimarg Kashmiri Pandit massacre case.

The case relates to the massacre of 24 Kashmiri Pandits by militant groups at Nadimarg village in Shopian district on Mar 23, 2003.

The dead included 11 men, 11 women and two children.

The High Court has ordered the trial court to ensure expeditious proceedings so as to conclude the matter at the earliest.

With this order, the trial of Nadimarg Kashmiri Pandit massacre case which was halted in 2011 will resume after 11 years.

Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul in the judgment ordered that the revision petition be allowed and the order dated Feb 9, 2011 passed by the court be set-aside.

The application for issuance of commission for examination of witnesses moved by the prosecution-State/petitioner has also been allowed.

"The court below (Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Shopian) shall now take all the necessary measures for ensuring the examination of the witnesses concerned by issuing commission and/or recording their statement video conferencing and shall ensure expeditious proceedings so as to conclude the matter at the earliest," the order read.

The main accused of the Nadimarg massacre case Zia Mustafa, a Lashkar-e-Taiba militant from Pakistan was killed on Oct 24, 2021 near the Line of Control in Poonch district of Jammu region.

Mustafa had spent the last 18 years in jail and was moved to Jammu’s Kot Bhalwal jail in 2018.

In October last year, Mustafa was brought to Mendhar on a 10-day remand from jail to help security forces identify a "terrorist hideout" in Mendhar.

When forces approached the hideout, police said, the infiltrators opened fire, injuring two policemen, a jawan and Mustafa.

The body of Mustafa was retrieved later.

On Apr 18, 2003, the three other Pakistani militants accused in the massacre case were killed in an encounter in south Kashmir.

The challan was filed against seven accused persons initially before the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Pulwama.

The case was later transferred to the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Shopian.

The case was closed when some witnesses moved out of the Kashmir Valley and the prosecution filed "moved an application before the trial court seeking permission to examine material prosecution witnesses on commission".

The trial court dismissed the application.

The prosecution challenged it in the high court and in 2011, it too dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition of the prosecution.

This year in August, the high court restored the revision petition of the State which had been dismissed in December 2011 for non-prosecution.

Justice Koul on Saturday said he was of the view that the court below has dismissed the application of the prosecution-State for examining the witness on commission on the irrelevant consideration while overlooking the material and relevant aspects of the case.

"The said application of the prosecution for recording statements of witnesses on commission deserved to be allowed," the judge observed.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.