April 01, 2026 11:10 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Unsubstantial allegations’: Calcutta HC dismisses plea on ECI’s officer transfers in Bengal | Tennis icon Leander Paes joins BJP ahead of Bengal polls | 8 killed, several injured in crowd crush at Bihar temple in Nalanda | Trump signals exit from Iran war even as Strait of Hormuz remains shut: Report | Mystery death in Pakistan: JeM chief Masood Azhar’s brother found dead | Trump shares Iran blasts video after fresh ‘blow up’ threat | Sensex plunges 1,600 pts, Nifty below 22,400 as oil price spike rattles markets | Nitish Kumar quits as Bihar CM after Rajya Sabha entry | Modi says govt taking steps to shield Indians from impact of Middle East crisis | Bengal polls a ‘fight for liberation from fear’, says Amit Shah as he unveils TMC chargesheet
Personal Liberty
Representational photo of rwo adults share a quiet moment at home, reflecting companionship and personal choice. Photo: ChatGPT

'Married man's consensual live-in relationship with an adult woman not a crime': Allahabad High Court

| @indiablooms | Mar 27, 2026, at 03:43 pm

Allahabad/IBNS: In a significant observation, the Allahabad High Court on Friday said it is not a crime for a married man to be in a consensual live-in relationship with an adult woman, according to media reports.

The court made the remark while hearing a writ petition filed by a live-in couple seeking to quash a police case lodged against them.

The petition was filed by Anamika and Netrapal after the woman’s mother, Kanti, registered a complaint at Jaitipur Police Station on January 8. She had alleged that Netrapal “enticed” her 18-year-old daughter to leave home with him, with assistance from another individual.

Challenging the case, the couple told the court they were consenting adults in a live-in relationship.

The court observed that no criminal offence is made out in such a situation and that Netrapal cannot be prosecuted merely for cohabiting with another woman despite being married.

The court directed the police not to arrest the couple and restrained the woman’s family members from causing them any harm. It also barred the family from visiting the couple’s residence or contacting them directly or indirectly.

Further, the court instructed the local Superintendent of Police to ensure the couple’s “safety and security.”

Taking note of the couple’s apprehension of “honour killing” and alleged death threats from family members, the court pulled up the police for inaction, stressing that it is their duty to protect the couple.

Emphasising that law must remain distinct from morality, the court underscored that individual rights cannot be dictated by social opinions.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.