December 12, 2024 11:37 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Devendra Fadnavis meets PM Modi amid suspense over Maharashtra portfolio allocation | Congress wants to deviate the issue of Sonia Gandhi-George Soros link: JP Nadda | Bengaluru techie suicide: Atul Subhash's family demanded Rs. 10 lakh as dowry leading to my father's death, claims estranged wife | Syria rebels torch tomb of ousted president Bashar al-Assad's father | Donald Trump vows to eliminate birthright citizenship after taking charge | No alliance with Congress in Delhi polls: AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal | Bengaluru techie's suicide: Atul Subhash's wife and her family booked | Bengaluru techie's suicide: Atul Subhash's wife and her family booked | INDIA bloc to knock on Supreme Court's doors over alleged EVM manipulation during Maharashtra polls | 'Babri Masjid should be rebuilt in Bengal's Murshidabad': TMC MLA Humayun Kabir sparks row

Shree Rajput Karni Sena to approach I & B Ministry on ‘Padmavati’

| | Feb 14, 2017, at 11:14 pm
New Delhi, Feb 14 (IBNS): Rajput youth organization Shree Rajput Karni Sena on Tuesday defended their tough stance against Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s period drama Padmavati while advocating the creation of a ‘Pre-Censor Board’ to monitor all period films and prevent any misrepresentation of history.

At a press conference held in the national capital today, representatives of the organization said they will soon be approaching the Information & Broadcasting Ministry to put forward their perspective and demands on the subject.


The organization also clarified that their objection is not against art but against distortion of history.


“We are not taking offence towards every form of art, or as a matter of fact against any filmmaker who wants to tell a period drama. But tampering the glory of Rajput history is something that needs to be considered with great amount of seriousness. Truth often gets overshadowed by the subjectivity of perception which can mislead generations of audience and result in poor understanding of history. And when comes to Bollywood, it has happened several times in the recent past, such as in the case of the film Jodha Akbar in 2008,” said Lokendra Singh Kalvi, Founder, Shree Rajput Karni Sena.


In a first-of-its-kind public policy advocacy, the Sena said their representation to the I&B Ministry includes a demand on setting up of a panel of experts to act as a ‘Pre-Censor Board’ tasked to supervise the filming of historical films in India.


“In our opinion, a pre-censor board consisting of experts should supervise and monitor any historical film to be made. This will help in overcoming the complications which come up during or after the film is made,” added Kalvi.


Bhansali’s Padmavati starring Deepika Padukone, Ranveer Singh and Shahid Kapoor has attracted major controversy over its potential depiction of history.


The film is based around the story of the invasion of Rajputana by Alauddin Khilji in the year 1303.


“We have been working for more than 10 years to safeguard the glory of the Rajput community and our ancestors. We are proud of our heritage and will not tolerate any conspiracy that compromises our self-respect. It’s unfortunate to see the Censor Board endorsing Bhansali. Few days back, when we met the censor board authorities, they told us that no action can be taken before the entire film is made and comes to us for review. However, I have personally met the director who has assured us that the film will show no intimate scenes between Ranveer and Deepika,” said Kalvi, talking about the Sena’s objection to the depiction of love scenes between the characters of Allauddin Khilji and Padmavati.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.