September 18, 2026 03:02 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Gurugram murder shocker: Groom-to-be leaves sisters at Delhi restaurant to meet ex-colleague, found dead days later | Delhi horror: Teen allegedly gangraped, stabbed to death and dumped in field; dogs eat parts of body | TMC name, symbol frozen: EC tells rival factions to pick new identities ahead of Bengal bypolls | Married just 17 days ago: Hyderabad engineer mysteriously found dead at US home | ‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests | Gurugram biker crash: Main accused Kalyan Bainsla sent to police custody for 2 days | ‘Just tax collection’: Ashneer Grover slams new UPI charges above Rs 2,000 | India condemns Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia, warns of threat to Red Sea shipping | Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed | Gurugram horror caught on camera: ‘I felt unsafe’—car chases, rams woman biker and flees
Air ticket refund

Supreme Court asks Cente to clarify over full refund of air ticket

| @indiablooms | Sep 10, 2020, at 12:56 am

New Delhi/UNI: Supreme Court Wednesday asked the Centre to clarify whether it is willing to give complete refund of air tickets booked for travel during the COVID-19 lockdown.

A bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan referred to a recent affidavit filed before it by the Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) saying that ticket booked for travel during the lockdown period will be refunded.

Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta, senior lawyer for the Central government, today told the court that the Centre has proposed a solution, subject to the court's approval.

Senior Advocate, Aryama Sundaram, appearing for Air Passengers Association of India, submitted to the top court that the petitioner is largely agreeable with the proposal of the Ministry of Civil Aviation except for one or two things.

Senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, for another petitioner, said that the proposal of the Centre is only confined to tickets booked during the lockdown. Refund should be given to all cancellations due to lockdown, irrespective of when tickets were booked.

After the hearing, the Supreme Court granted time to airline operators and all other parties and stakeholders, including the Central government, to file their affidavits.

The Apex Court asked the Centre also file an additional affidavit with clarifications, and fixed the matter for further hearing till September 23, Wednesday.

SG Mehta, said that there are three categories we have earmarked. First, the domestic flights, secondly, the international flights by Indian carriers, and lastly, the International flights by foreign carriers for which tickets were booked in India.

Justice Bhushan asked him, whether cancellation of tickets for travel during lockdown which were booked before lockdown are also taken care of.

Senior advocate, Harish Salve, appearing for Spicejet, submitted to the Top Court that his client is happy with the formulation of the Central Government.

Arvind Datar, lawyer appearing for GoAir submitted that his clients have some points of objection.

Senior lawyer and former Attorney General (AG) Mukul Rohatgi, for Indigo, submitted to the Top Court that he needs to file a reply to the Centre's affidavit.

Pinaki Mishra, for Air Vistara & Air Asia also sought time for reply in the case.

Liz Mathew, lawyer for one of the petitioners submitted that her client had booked tickets in December 2019 for travel during the period for which lockdown was imposed later. She seeks a clarification that such cases will also get the benefit of refund.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.