January 07, 2025 10:10 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Centre announces memorial for Pranab Mukherjee, his daughter thanks PM Modi for 'gracious gesture' | Delhi assembly elections on Feb 5, results on Feb 8 | Allu Arjun visits boy injured during Pushpa 2 stampede in Hyderabad | Donald Trump repeats his US-Canada merger offer after Justin Trudeau's resignation | India's HMPV cases surge to 7 after two cases reported from Nagpur | H-1B visa renewal will get simpler in 2025, Indians to benefit most as home country travel won't be required | As India detects 3 HMPV cases, #lockdown trends; Centre says no need to panic | Justin Trudeau announces resignation as Canada's PM amid rising pressure by partymates | 8 jawans, driver killed as Maoists blow up security vehicle in Chhattisgarh's Bijapur | Atul Subhash suicide: Karnataka High Court refuses to quash FIR against wife Nikita Singhania
Morbi Mishap
Image Credit: UNI

Supreme Court calls Morbi incident 'enormous tragedy'

| @indiablooms | Nov 21, 2022, at 08:44 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday observed that the Morbi bridge collapse was an "enormous tragedy" and urged the Gujarat High Court to take up the matter suo motu to hear the proper aspects of the probe, fix accountability and ensure adequate compensation to the victims.

"It is an enormous tragedy and this will require a weekly monitoring to see award of contract, credential of party awarded the contract, attribution of responsibility for those guilty.

"The Gujarat High Court has taken charge (in initiating the suo motu case) else, we would have issued notice," a bench of the Supreme Court headed by Justice Dr D Y Chadrachud said.

The Supreme Court was hearing a plea filed by family members of some victims in the case, filed by lawyer Vishal Tiwari, seeking direction to appoint a judicial commission under the supervision of retired Supreme Court court judge to initiate a probe on the bridge collapse which killed 140 people.

"The court is undoubtedly seized of ensuring a proper regulatory mechanism so that such instances don't recur. Since the Gujarat High Court is seized of the matter, it is appropriate that further conduct remains with that division bench of the HC," the Supreme Court said.

The apex court also noted that an award of compensation to the heirs of those who lost lives would have to be considered in this aspect by the Gujarat High Court.

As many as 140 have died, out of which 47 are children. More than 70 were injured.

The Chief Justice also flagged certain issues to be dealt by the Gujarat High Court: need for investigation probe into acts of criminal wrongdoing, the need to affix responsibility against officials of Nagar Palika and need to ensure that agencies which were entrusted to maintain the bridge are held accountable including making arrests.

Senior lawyer Gopal Sankarnarayanan, advocate appearing for one of the victims, told the court that his own disquiet was investigation and that arrests should be the first thing,

"I do not know if the Gujarat HC has not done that yet, will it ever do so," he told the apex court.

Gopal also questioned the kind of compensation given to the victims: Rs 2 lakh from the Prime Minister Relief Fund and 4 lakh from the Chief Minister's Relief Fund.

He said: "Rs 10-15 crore is given for sports but nothing here. These policies have to be looked into regarding compensation."

Lawyer Tiwari had moved the Supreme Court demanding a court-monitored judicial inquiry into the horrific tragedy.

The PIL filed by Tiwari, sought a probe to be ordered by the Supreme Court and headed by a retired Supreme Court judge.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.