June 14, 2026 12:53 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Tragedy in the skies: Five IAF personnel killed in AN-32 crash in Assam | 'Ask probe officers whether I hid anything': Abhishek Banerjee hits back after pre-dawn police search | Police storm Abhishek Banerjee's house at 3 am tracking aide, Mamata arrives; seizure list says 'NIL' | Big boost for India's security: DRDO successfully tests advanced missile shield | Indian-origin man jailed for 34 years in UK over horrific kidnap, torture and rape case | Mamata's nightmare deepens! Saayoni Ghosh, Dev, Rachana Banerjee among 19 rebel MPs seeking TMC split | Trump claims US 'ended war with Iran', Tehran yet to confirm a deal | Heartbreak for Indian sports: Manu Bhaker's mentor Jaspal Rana passes away at 49 | Three Indian seafarers, missing after US strike on tanker near Oman, confirmed dead | 'Choose your side': TMC MP Kalyan Banerjee's ultimatum to Mamata in open revolt against Abhishek
Electoral Bonds
Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

Supreme Court strikes down electoral bonds scheme, calls it 'unconstitutional'

| @indiablooms | Feb 15, 2024, at 05:09 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: In a landmark verdict months ahead of the Lok Sabha elections, the Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the electoral bonds scheme calling it "unconstitutional", media reports said.

The top court said the scheme violates the Right to Information and Section 19(1)(a).

"The Electoral bonds scheme has to be struck down as unconstitutional. It violates the right to information of citizens, about possible quid pro quo," the court remarked as quoted by NDTV.

The scheme, which was introduced during the Union Budget 2017-18, is a way to fund political parties in India.

In its order, the Supreme Court acknowledged that not all donations to political parties are made to change public policies as students and daily wagers contribute too.

However, the court said the contributions made by companies are "purely business transactions" and have greater influence on political processes.

The top court said as quoted by NDTV, "Before amendment, loss making companies were not able to contribute. The amendment does not recognize the harm of allowing loss-making companies to contribute due to quid pro quo.

"The amendment to Section 182 Companies Act is manifestly arbitrary for not making distinction between loss making and profit making companies."

Ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, the primary opposition party Congress had promised to quash electoral bonds if the party was voted to power.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.