May 16, 2026 02:16 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds Bhojshala complex disputed site to be a temple | ‘Even ex-CM can be probed’: Suvendu Adhikari’s big statement on RG Kar case | Big action in RG Kar case: Bengal CM Suvendu Adhikari suspends 3 IPS officers, including ex-CP Vineet Goyal | Modi’s UAE visit delivers major defence, energy deals amid Middle East tensions | BRICS sideline: Jaishankar holds crucial talks with Iran as West Asia tensions | Suvendu Adhikari resigns as Nandigram MLA, keeps Bhabanipur seat | Modi’s UAE visit delivers major defence, energy deals amid Middle East tensions | NEET (UG) 2026 re-exam scheduled for June 21 amid massive 'paper leak' row | ECI announces third phase of SIR; Himachal, J&K, Ladakh excluded for now | Storm fury in Uttar Pradesh: Death toll rises to 89 as rain, gale-force winds leave trail of destruction

Terrorism should not be politised, says BJP MP Satya Pal Singh

| @indiablooms | Jul 15, 2019, at 05:23 pm

New Delhi, Jul 15 (UNI) BJP Member Satya Pal Singh on Monday emphasised that terrorism should not politicised and the menace affects the entire humanity.

Speaking during the debate on The National Investigation Agency (NIA) Bill, 2019 in the Lok Sabha, the Baghpat lawmaker said earlier terrorism was politicised in the countyry, adding that the previous regime never tackled terrorism as serious crime against humanity.

Citing terrorisn cases of Malegaon case and Hyderabad, he said the terrorism cases were made political as it did not suit the ruling dispensation.

Condemining the erstwhile UPA regime, he said 'In India, we waited for 7 years to get a new law for terrorism while in the United States, a appropriate law was made to intercept and obstruct terrorism immediately.

The US has separate law for terrorism so David Hadley was convicted, he said.

Singh, who was Mumbai Police Commissioner, said assets attaching powers is vested with the state DGP, and suggested that this power should be given to the NIA DGP.

He also suggested that NIA is applicable to Jammu and Kashmir and suggested that 'Ranbir Penal Code' applicable in the northern state, should be included in the Act.

Biju Janata Dal Member Bhartruhari Mahtab suggested that highest state police officer should be informed about the terorism cases being investigated and said why there is mismatch between state police and central forces.

He said if state DGP becomes part of investigation, it becomes useful.

Kalyan Banerjee of Trinamool Congress wondered whether by the new Bill the existing NIA law being diluted.

He also said when India is attacked, not many countries speak about it but when the US suffers terrorist attack, all countries are making a hue and cry.

Banerjee said since there is no treaty with Pakistan then how will the provisions of the new law be applicable to the Western neighbour.

The Bill states that among other things, the NIA officials will have the power to investigate scheduled offences committed outside India subject to international treaties.

Since the object is speedy trial, Banerjee suggested that the time taken for investigation should be fixed and a clause should be added for this, so that there is accountability.

Danish Ali of BSP, Durga Prasad Rao of YSRCP, Rahul Ramesh Shewale of Shiv Sena and Meenakshi Lekhi also spoke.

The debate was initiated earlier by Congress member Manish Tewari. 

Image: UNI

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.