January 10, 2025 03:54 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Los Angeles wildfire toll climbs to 10, thousands of structures destroyed | 8 labourers still trapped in Assam's flooded mine even after 3 days of rescue ops | SC refuses to hear petitions seeking review of its same-sex marriage judgement, says there is 'no error' | 'They should wind up the alliance': Omar Abdullah on AAP-Congress fight over Delhi elections | Pune woman killed by her colleague in full public view for not paying back his money, no one intervenes | Los Angeles wildfire leaves 5 dead, forces 1 lakh including celebs to flee, Hollywood hills ablazed | PM Modi condoles death of six people in Tirupati stampede incident | Days after condemning Pak airstrikes, India in a first engages with Afghanistan's Taliban regime | 6 dead in stampede near Tirupati temple during token distribution to offer prayers | Prominent journalist-film producer Pritish Nandy dies of cardiac arrest at 73

UPA followed sadistic economy: FM on Natarajan's letter

| | Jan 30, 2015, at 04:28 pm
New Delhi, Jan 30 (IBNS) Slamming over senior Congress leader and former Environment Minister Jayanthi Natarajan's explosive letter to Congress president Sonia Gandhi against party vice-president Rahul Gandhi, Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on Friday said the former UPA government used to follow 'sadistic economy'.

"The UPA was a practitioner of sadistic economy. It was vindictive in nature... India suffered in the last few years of UPA government due to this sadistic economy," Jaitley told reporters.

Natarajan is set to resign from the party, after shooting off an explosive letter to Sonia Gandhi (written in Nov last year) where she accused vice-president of the party Rahul Gandhi of interference in government work while she was a minister.

In her letter she said she took care of the requests of Rahul Gandhi but  faced "a hysterical vicious false and motivated campaign against me, in the media, orchestrated entirely by particular chosen individuals in the party."

"There was not a single word of truth in what was said, nor was there a single concrete fact," she said.

She said even after her resignation, she "received information that persons from the office of Shri Rahul Gandhi were calling the media and planting stories that my resignation was NOT for party work."

While Natarajan had been accused being a hindrance to major projects, she wrote in the letter: "I was never a bottleneck, nor was I ever responsible for unwarranted delays in major projects, and I can prove this at any time. I was shattered by the attack upon me, and bewildered. I wrote a passionate message to Shri Rahul Gandhi, about my removal as Minister, and his speech, at FICCI, and asked him what wrongdoing I had committed to warrant this treatment."

"I said, that I should have been asked for an explanation, IF I had done anything wrong, as even a murderer has his say in court, and here I don’t even know what, if any wrong doing was committed by me. I told him that my family legacy and my name would be forever ruined, and all I had done was my duty. I asked him to tell me, what wrong I had committed. I asked for time to meet him. He replied that he was “running a little busy” at that time, but that he would meet me a little later.

"Despite several requests, that day never came. Not till this minute. I took a break of 10 days, and went to my sister’s home to recover," she wrote.

She said over the last 11 months (till Nov when the letter was written), she had suffered the most excruciating mental agony, and have been continuously attacked, wrongly vilified and defamed in the media, and exposed to every possible humiliation in public life.  

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.