January 19, 2025 03:13 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Kolkata court convicts civic volunteer Sanjoy Roy in RG Kar rape-murder case | Saif was stabbed repeatedly, he tried to protect Taimur and Jeh: Kareena Kapoor Khan records statement with police | Escaped death by 20-25 minutes: Sheikh Hasina alleges opposition wanted to kill her | Cabinet's decision on 8th Pay Commission will improve quality of life, give boost to consumption: PM Modi | 'It has been an incredibly challenging day': Kareena Kapoor Khan requests privacy after Saif Ali Khan's stabbing incident | 'Distorting history': Mamata slams Mohan Bhagwat over his Ram Temple consecration 'marking true independence' remark | Saif Ali Khan stabbing incident: Actor who received six wounds is out of danger, one accused identified | ISRO creates history docking two Indian satellites in space | US-based short seller Hindenburg Research that targeted Adani Group and SEBI chairperson to be disbanded | Saif Ali Khan stabbed during burglary attempt at home, hospitalised; police probe on
Rahul Dravid
Image Credit: Facebook/Rahul Dravid

We could have been a bit careful at shot-making: Rahul Dravid on India's WTC performance

| @indiablooms | Jun 12, 2023, at 02:30 am

London: Indian Head Coach Rahul Dravid said giving away 157 runs in the last session of Day 1, and careless shots by top batsmen were the reasons for India's defeat at the hands of Australia in the final of the World Test Championship at The Oval here on Sunday.

"It wasn't a 469 wicket. On the first day, last session, conceding 157 [for no wicket] was disappointing ... The lengths weren't bad, but we went wide with our lines, gave a lot of room to Travis Head, he capitalised and we fell behind," he told Star Sports after the match.

"Yesterday I felt on this wicket, we played three-four shots, we could've been a bit careful," Dravid said.

Asked about India's decision to bowl first, Dravid said the overcast conditions and grass on the wicket on Day 1 were the reasons. And the Team also felt batting gets easier n England even on fourth and fifth day, he said. "At 70 [76] for 3, we felt it was a good decision, but the complexion of the game changed in the two sessions after that," Dravid defended.

"Had we restricted them to 300-odd, it would've been a good score, we would've still been in the game, and it would've been a tight third and fourth innings. It's one of those things in England. Last year at Edgbaston, the fourth innings became easier, and England chased 380 [378] easily. We knew 444 is a lot of runs, but if we kept them to 320, we could've chased it."

Asked by Harbhajan Singh if India needed to relook at having turning tracks to suit their spinners at home at the cost of exposing batsmen against quality pace abroad, Dravid said such risks need to be taken as obtaining points to qualify for WTC finals matters a lot.

"Nobody wants wickets to turn from the first ball and turn square, but certainly when you're playing the WTC and playing for points, as it gets to the back end of it ... everyone wants to come to games like this [final]. In situations like that, at times, you have to take a few risks," he said.

It is not only India, but also other teams are taking risks, Dravid argued. "We're not the only team taking risks ... Australia also used to play on wickets that lasted five days, but now they're also playing on wickets that are lasting three-four days in their own country," he contended.

(With UNIinpuits)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.