April 01, 2026 05:01 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal SIR progress: 47 lakh of 60 lakh adjudicated cases disposed of, Supreme Court informed | Amit Shah to join Suvendu Adhikari on Bhabanipur nomination day; BJP plans mega roadshow | Fuel prices rise: Premium petrol, diesel hiked amid oil price surge | Commercial LPG up Rs 195.50 as global oil prices rise; domestic rates unchanged | Layoff alert: Oracle cuts 30,000 jobs globally, 12,000 hit in India | ‘Unsubstantial allegations’: Calcutta HC dismisses plea on ECI’s officer transfers in Bengal | Tennis icon Leander Paes joins BJP ahead of Bengal polls | 8 killed, several injured in crowd crush at Bihar temple in Nalanda | Trump signals exit from Iran war even as Strait of Hormuz remains shut: Report | Mystery death in Pakistan: JeM chief Masood Azhar’s brother found dead
Gita Gopinath
Former IMF chief economist Gita Gopinath. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Ex-IMF chief economist Gita Gopinath evaluates Trump's tariff imposition move, calls overall impact ‘negative’

| @indiablooms | Oct 09, 2025, at 12:07 am

Harvard Economics Professor and former IMF Chief Economist Gita Gopinath has assessed the impact of the tariffs imposed by the Donald Trump administration, concluding that their overall effect has been negative.

In a post on X, Gopinath wrote: “It is six months since ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs. What have U.S. tariffs accomplished?”

She said the tariffs had raised substantial revenue for the government but noted that the burden was borne almost entirely by U.S. firms and partly passed on to consumers, functioning effectively as a tax on domestic businesses and households.

The tariffs also contributed to higher inflation, particularly for items such as household appliances, furniture, and coffee, she added.

However, Gopinath said there was no evidence that the measures had improved U.S. manufacturing or significantly altered the trade balance, concluding that the “overall scorecard is negative.”

Impact on India

The Trump administration, which was earlier seen as India-friendly, has imposed a 25 percent tariff on Indian exports, citing high Indian tariffs on U.S. goods and New Delhi’s continued purchases of Russian oil amid the war in Ukraine.

Since the conflict began in early 2022, India has sharply increased imports of discounted Russian crude, which now accounts for over 30 percent of its total oil imports. Indian refineries subsequently export refined petroleum products worldwide — a practice critics in Washington argue indirectly supports Russia’s war effort.

In response, the U.S. has proposed additional tariffs and trade measures aimed at discouraging India’s reliance on Russian crude.

India, for its part, has said it will take all necessary steps to protect its national interests and economic security, maintaining that its energy policy is driven by domestic needs and price stability considerations.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.