April 15, 2026 04:53 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping | I don’t care if they come back or not, says Trump after Iran talks collapse | Legendary singer Asha Bhosle suffers cardiac arrest, hospitalised | Big boost to India–Mauritius ties: S. Jaishankar hands over 90 e-buses | Middle East tension: Iranian delegation arrives in Islamabad for major talks, 10,000 security personnel deployed | Ranveer Singh visits RSS HQ amid Dhurandhar 2 success, triggers speculation | ED raids ex-Bengal minister Partha Chatterjee; SSC scam resurfaces ahead of polls | Amit Shah promises UCC, ₹3,000 aid per month for women and youth in BJP’s Bengal manifesto
Image Credit : White House X handle/ wikipedia.org

Trump downplays security breach after Atlantic editor mistakenly added to classified Signal chat

| @indiablooms | Mar 27, 2025, at 02:22 pm

In an unusual security lapse, veteran US journalist Jeffrey Goldberg revealed that he was inadvertently added to a private group chat with senior Trump administration officials as they discussed plans to attack Yemen’s Houthis earlier this month, media reports said.

Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, recounted the incident in an article titled "The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans".

The encrypted Signal chat included key officials such as Vice President JD Vance, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

How did the journalist end up in the chat?

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump addressed the apparent security breach, confirming that Goldberg had been mistakenly included in a classified Signal chat discussing military operations against the Iran-backed Houthis.

Trump attributed the incident to an error by a junior staff member working under National Security Adviser Mike Waltz. “And what it was, we believe, is somebody that was on the line with permission; somebody that was with Mike Waltz — worked for Mike Waltz at a lower level — had, I guess, Goldberg's number or called through the app, and somehow this guy ended up on the call,” Trump said in an interview with Newsmax.

The chat, named "Houthi PC small group," reportedly included 18 senior officials coordinating the US military response to Houthi aggression, according to TOI.

Trump insisted that the discussion did not contain classified details, adding, “There was no problem, and the attack was a tremendous success.”

Administration response and fallout

National Security Adviser Mike Waltz later acknowledged the mistake, stating he was unsure how Goldberg was added to the chat.

“I’ve never met him, don’t know him, and have never communicated with him,” Waltz said.

Appearing on Fox News Channel’s The Ingraham Angle, he admitted to creating the chat and confirmed that White House technical experts were investigating how Goldberg’s number had been included.

“We made a mistake. We’re moving forward,” Waltz said, taking “full responsibility” for the mishap.

Trump dismisses concerns

Trump downplayed the incident, calling it “the only glitch in two months” and reiterating that no classified intelligence was exposed. He also criticised The Atlantic and Goldberg, announcing that the administration would limit its use of Signal for sensitive discussions.

“We won’t be using it very much,” Trump remarked, adding that he preferred in-person meetings under strict security. “If it were up to me, everyone would be in a room together—with solid lead walls, a lead ceiling, and a lead floor.”

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.