2002 Godhra train burning case: Supreme Court dismisses bail plea of 3 convicts
New Delhi/UNI; The Supreme Court on Monday in its order rejected the bail pleas of three Godhra train burning case convicts of 2002, after terming their offences and cases as "serious and not isolated ones."
A bench of the Supreme Court, headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dr Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud rejected the bail pleas filed by three, 2002 Godhra train burning case convicts -- Saukat Abdulla Moulvi Ismail Badam, Siddik Mohammad Mora (Moraiya) and Bilal -- keeping in view their acts and specific roles assigned to them.
"The incident is serious, not isolated ones. We are at this stage not inclined to grant them bail," the CJI Dr Chandrachud said in the order.
The Supreme Court also in its order noted that their death sentences had been commuted by the Gujarat High Court.
The convicts had played specific roles like pouring petrol and being involved in other offences.
While rejecting the bail plea of the three convicts, the Supreme Court said that the State of Gujarat's appeal for increasing their sentence is kept pending for final disposal.
The top court, however, agreed to list their appeals before an appropriate bench for listing and adjudicating their prayers.
Earlier, in May 2022, the Supreme Court had granted interim bail to Abdul Rahman Dhantiya on medical grounds to attend to his wife, and mentally challenged daughters. In December 2022, it also granted bail to another convict who had spent 17 years in jail.
The February 27, 2002 train burning incident in Godhra led to communal riots in Gujarat.
A total of 31 convicts were sentenced by the trial court in 2011 — 11 were sentenced to death and 20 to life imprisonment. In 2017, the Gujarat High Court commuted the death sentence to life terms — all 31 got life imprisonment.
Support Our Journalism
We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism
IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.