December 14, 2024 12:26 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Pushpa 2 stampede: Allu Arjun walks out of jail, actor's lawyer slams delay in release | Donald Trump intends to end 'inconvenient' and 'very costly' Daylight Saving Time | Suchir Balaji: Indian-origin former OpenAI researcher found dead at US apartment | Bengaluru techie suicide: Karnataka Police issues summons to wife Nikita, her family members | French President Macron appoints centrist leader Francois Bayrou as new Prime Minister | Congress always prioritised personal interest over Constitution: Rajnath Singh | Jaishankar calls attack on Hindus in Bangladesh 'a source of concern' | Allu Arjun arrested over woman's death in stampede during Pushpa 2 premiere show | RBI receives bomb threat in Russian language, case filed | UP teenager kills mother, lives with body for 5 days

Ayodhya case: Daily hearings end, Supreme Court reserves verdict

| @indiablooms | Oct 16, 2019, at 04:12 pm

New Delhi: Ending the 40-day hearing, the Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its judgement in the politically-sensitive Ayodhya case. 

This was the last day of hearing in the case.

On the last day of hearing, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi was annoyed after the representative of the Muslim petitioners torn apart a pictorial map showing Ram Janmasthan handed over by a counsel of All India Hindu Mahasabha, media reports said.

Reacting to the incident, CJI Gogoi said the decorum of the top court is being spoiled.

The case is related to the issue that whether the Ram Temple can be built in Uttar Pradesh's Ayodhya area.

The Supreme Court resumed the day-to-day hearings on the case on Monday after a week-long Dussera holiday.

What happened in Ayodhya and why the case is significant?

In 1992, the disputed Babri Masjid structure was brought down by several right-wing volunteers who believe Lord Ram was born on that site.

On Sept 27 last year, the apex court had refused to re-visit its 1994 verdict which had stated mosque was not important for Muslims to offer prayers, paving way for the hearing of the Ayodhya case.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.