December 18, 2024 13:08 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Congress' lies can't hide their misdeeds: Modi on row over Amit Shah's Ambedkar comment | 'Daily drama': BJP hits back at Congress' attack on Amit Shah over Ambedkar remark | Spin bowling legend Ravichandran Ashwin retires from international cricket | India-Australia third Test ends in a draw as rain plays spoilsport | 54-year-old leader calls himself Yuva: Amit Shah takes dig at Rahul Gandhi in Rajya Sabha | BJP to send notices to MPs absent during 'One Nation One Election' Bill tabling | GRAP 4 restrictions reimposed in Delhi as air quality dips to 'severe' category | 39 ministers included in Devendra Fadnavis-led Maharashtra cabinet | People who raise questions on EVMs should show how they can be hacked: TMC trashes Congress claims | Bangladesh likely to hold national polls in late 2025 or early 2026, says Yunus in Victory Day speech

Ayodhya title suit: Ram chabutra is not birthplace of Lord Ram, Muslim side asserts in court

| @indiablooms | Sep 25, 2019, at 05:39 pm

New Delhi, Sep 25 (UNI) Sunni Waqf Board does not accept that Ram chabutra is the birthplace of Lord Ram, the Muslim side on Wednesday told the Supreme Court's five-judge Constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi.

"Sunni Waqf Board does not accept that Ram chabutra is birth place of Ram," Zafaryab Jilani, counsel for Muslim respondents affirmed before the bench hearing a batch of appeals against the September 2010 Allahabad High Court trifurcation of the 2.77 acres disputed site.

"Our stance is that it is their belief and we are not taking any steps in that regard after an observation to that effect by a District Judge," Mr Jilani submitted.

Sunni Waqf Board stance is Lord Ram was born in Ayodhya but exact spot is not the disputed site, Jilani told the apex court.

He said Sunni Waqf Board also clarifies that it does not accept Ram Chabutra as the birth spot though Hindus believe it.

Meenakshi Arora, another lawyer for Muslim side, told the Supreme Court that the 356-year-old status quo needs to be maintained as said by a judge.

The District Judge felt that its too late to decide on the title and it would be not good to allow the dispute but rather allow the status quo to prevail, she said.

The hearing is in progress before the five-judge Constitution bench of the Apex Court. 

Image: UNI

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.