March 30, 2025 04:55 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Telangana man marries two women in same ceremony after falling in love with both | Vladimir Putin says Russia won't interfere in Donald Trump's plans to 'take over' Greenland | India ready to offer possible assistance: PM Modi on Myanmar, Thailand earthquake | Magnitude 7.7 Earthquake hits Myanmar, strong tremors felt in Bangkok | 'Complete lawlessness': Suvendu Adhikari writes to Bengal Guv over Malda violence | 'You are a liar': Mamata Banerjee faces guests' ire over Singur, RG Kar, 'attack on Hindus' at London event | 3 cops killed, 2 terrorists shot dead during J&K's Kathua encounter: Report | Kolkata couple sues IVF centre for not revealing daughter's biological parents' identity, blames it for her death | 'India is not Dharamshala', Amit Shah says as Lok Sabha passes Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025 | 'Now it's our turn': Vladimir Putin accepts Narendra Modi's invitation to visit India
Maratha reservation
Image credit: UNI

Bombay HC to deliver Maratha reservation interim stay verdict on April 10

| @@indiablooms | Mar 13, 2024, at 04:10 am

Mumbai/IBNS/UNI: A division bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Arif Doctor of the Bombay High Court on Tuesday indicated that it would decide on April 10 on the issue of granting an interim stay on the government’s decision to grant reservation to the Maratha community.

The bench was hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the law passed by the Maharashtra Legislature granting 10 percent reservation to the Maratha community.

On Tuesday, the petitioners sought a stay on the implementation of the Act, pending a final hearing decision in the petitions.

The court said before granting any interim stay it has to hear all the parties.

“It is not a simple administrative order. It is a legislation. Hence, we have to keep in mind the principles laid down while hearing pleas challenging constitutional validity of the legislation. There is a principle of presumed constitutionality. This is a legislative enactment, we will have to give due weightage to all arguments,” the bench noted.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu