December 15, 2024 03:32 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Pushpa 2 stampede: Allu Arjun walks out of jail, actor's lawyer slams delay in release | Donald Trump intends to end 'inconvenient' and 'very costly' Daylight Saving Time | Suchir Balaji: Indian-origin former OpenAI researcher found dead at US apartment | Bengaluru techie suicide: Karnataka Police issues summons to wife Nikita, her family members | French President Macron appoints centrist leader Francois Bayrou as new Prime Minister | Congress always prioritised personal interest over Constitution: Rajnath Singh | Jaishankar calls attack on Hindus in Bangladesh 'a source of concern' | Allu Arjun arrested over woman's death in stampede during Pushpa 2 premiere show | RBI receives bomb threat in Russian language, case filed | UP teenager kills mother, lives with body for 5 days

Compensation for sexual harassment not taxable : IT Tribunal on Sushmita Sen case

| @indiablooms | Nov 20, 2018, at 04:02 pm

Mubai, Nov 20 (IBNS) :The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that no tax liability arises over compensation received by a victim of sexual harassment, reported News18.

This ruling was delivered by the quasi-judicial body while hearing the tax-related case of actor Sushmita Sen.

The actor had received Rs. 95 lakh as part of the settlement with the beverage company, Coca-Cola in 2003-04. She had alleged sexual harassment by one of the company’s employees. The Tribunal had marked the compensation as a “capital receipt” for Sushmita Sen and thus could not be taxed like an income.

The actor, who has played roles in blockbuster Bollywood movies like Main Hoon Na and was crowned Miss Universe in 1994 at the age of 18, had entered into a promotional deal with Coca-Cola worth Rs 1.5 crore. However, the contract ended prematurely and she got Rs 1.45 crore from Coca-Cola as the final settlement for sexual harassment allegations.

But the actor only showed Rs 50 lakh as income and the rest as capital gains.

Concurring with this, the Tribunal stated, “The only logical deduction was that the company accepted the contention of the assessee of the alleged sexual harassment and paid the compensation to avoid negative publicity/embarrassment which would have jeopardised the business of the company world over. The additional compensation was not towards the service rendered and did not arise out of the contractual terms.”

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.