December 18, 2024 15:13 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Congress' lies can't hide their misdeeds: Modi on row over Amit Shah's Ambedkar comment | 'Daily drama': BJP hits back at Congress' attack on Amit Shah over Ambedkar remark | Spin bowling legend Ravichandran Ashwin retires from international cricket | India-Australia third Test ends in a draw as rain plays spoilsport | 54-year-old leader calls himself Yuva: Amit Shah takes dig at Rahul Gandhi in Rajya Sabha | BJP to send notices to MPs absent during 'One Nation One Election' Bill tabling | GRAP 4 restrictions reimposed in Delhi as air quality dips to 'severe' category | 39 ministers included in Devendra Fadnavis-led Maharashtra cabinet | People who raise questions on EVMs should show how they can be hacked: TMC trashes Congress claims | Bangladesh likely to hold national polls in late 2025 or early 2026, says Yunus in Victory Day speech
Demonetisation
Image credit: Press Information Bureau

Demonetisation decision was taken to fight fake currency, terror financing, black money: Centre to SC

| @indiablooms | Nov 17, 2022, at 04:40 am

New Delhi/UNI: Justifying its decision to demonetise Rs 500 and 1,000 currency notes in 2016, the Centre has said that it was aimed at fighting the menace of fake currency notes, terror financing, black money and tax evasion.

The Centre, in its 16-page affidavit filed in the Supreme Court, said that it was a part of a larger strategy for combating the menace of fake money, terror financing, black money and tax evasion, but not confined to them alone.

The affidavit was filed by the Centre, which opposed the batch of pleas challenging the Centre's November 8, 2016 decision. The matter is being heard by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court at present.

The Centre filed this affidavit, after complying with the Apex Court's order asking it to file the written affidavit in the case.

The Centre told the Supreme Court that the nation underwent an important transformation through a series of economic policies and events, and withdrawal of the legal tender character was one important action in that series.

It said notification withdrew the legal tender character of the specified banknotes (SBN), which is generally called as "demonetisation"."The notification issued on 08.11.2016 was a major step to fight the menace of fake currency notes, storage of unaccounted wealth and financing of subversive activities," the government said.

Justifying its decision, the Narendra Modi government also said, "The expansion of the formal sector and the shrinking of the informal sector were undertaken through a series of policy measures.

"The policy push included digitalising transactions, technology connectivity and implementation to enable last-mile reach, increasing the tax base, enhancing tax compliance, lowering the cost of doing business, eliminating policy distortions, facilitating financial inclusion at the formal sector level and labour and agrarian reforms."

The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court would hear the matter now next on Nov 24, to the pleas challenging the Centre's decision to demonetize currency notes of Rs. 500 and 1,000 in 2016 and said that they want to conclude the hearing on this issue this year.

Various petitions were filed arising from the decision of the Centre to demonetize the old notes of Rs.500/- and Rs.1000.

One of the petitions was filed by lawyer, Vivek Narayan Sharma. The petition has challenged the notification dated Nov 8, 2016.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.