January 01, 2025 09:04 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Indian-origin doctor among 2 killed in UAE light aircraft crash | 'We will take revenge, with interest:' Suvendu Adhikari warns Mamata Banerjee over her Sandeshkhali claims | 'Forgive and forget mistake': Manipur CM N Biren Singh apologises for ethnic clashes | Deeply malicious and utterly condemnable: Pinarayi Vijayan on BJP leader Nitesh Rane's 'Kerala is mini Pakistan' remark | Rohit Sharma to quit Test cricket after Border Gavaskar Trophy in Sydney: Report | Yemen approves death sentence for Indian nurse, MEA responds | Truth ultimately gets revealed: Mamata Banerjee in her first visit to Sandeshkhali after Lok Sabha polls | ISRO launches SpaDeX mission aimed for 'in-space docking' | 'Law is equal for all': Pawan Kayan on Allu Arjun's arrest in theatre stampede case | Highly objectionable and I was hurt that Arvind Kejriwal called Atishi temporary: Lt Governor

Have not supported the communication blockade in valley: PCI chairman

| @indiablooms | Aug 28, 2019, at 09:05 pm

New Delhi, Aug 28 (UNI): Press Council of India on Wednesday refuted the comments made by noted journalist N Ram that the council was supporting the communication curbs in Jammu and Kashmir.

In a letter to N Ram, council chairman Justice Chandramauli Kumar Prasad, referring to a news report published in an English daily on Wednesday that had a heading that 'PCI backing J and K curbs undemocratic: N Ram’, said that in his intervention application in the Supreme court, he had not supported the communication blockade.

"From a plain reading of the intervention application filed by the council in the Supreme court, it is evident that I have not supported the communication blockade," he said.

I will advise you to read the intervention application which is available on the website and point out a single sentence or a single word where I have “supported the communication blockade in the valley. I challenge, you will not find anything like that,’’ Justice Prasad said in his letter.

He said that the very premise of the news report was falsehood.

"According to the news report, you have allegedly stated that it was shocking that the PCI-that is supposed to protect the freedom of the press, independence of the press, freedom of journalists- had taken a position supporting the communication blockade in the valley."

"The very premise on which you have build this superstructure, mildly speaking, is a blatant lie. I am sure you have not read the ‘intervention application, filed by the council before the Supreme Court but greatly swayed by distorted media reports,’’ Justice Prasad said.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.