India's foreign ministry says family met Indian prisoner in Pakistan, Jadhav, under intimidating atmosphere

In the release, the MEA has said that the overall atmosphere of the meeting between Jadhav and his mother and wife 'was intimidating insofar as family members were concerned'.

The release also claimed that the Pakistan media were allowed to approach the family members despite an understanding that the media would not be allowed.

The release has also said that not only were the family members forced to remove mangal sutra, bangles and bindi, Jhadav's mother was not allowed to speak to her son in the mother tongue.

An extract from the press release:

" As you are all aware, the mother and wife of Shri Kulbhushan Jadhav met him yesterday in Islamabad. The meeting took place after requests by India for family access.

Prior to the meeting, the two Governments were in touch through diplomatic channels to work out its modalities and format. There were clear understandings between the two sides and the Indian side scrupulously abided by all its commitments.

However, we note with regret that the Pakistani side conducted the meeting in a manner which violated the letter and spirit of our understandings. This included:

i. The Pakistani press was allowed on multiple occasions to approach family members closely, harass and hector them and hurl false and motivated accusations about Shri Jadhav. This was despite a clear agreement that the media would not be allowed close access.

ii. Under the pretext of security precautions, the cultural and religious sensibilities of family members were disregarded. This included removal of mangal sutra, bangles and bindi, as well as a change in attire that was not warranted by security.

iii. The mother of Shri Jadhav was prevented from talking in their mother tongue, although this was clearly the natural medium of communication. She was repeatedly interrupted while doing so and eventually prevented from proceeding further in this regard.

iv. Deputy High Commissioner was initially separated from family members who were taken to the meeting without informing him. The meeting was started without his presence and he could join only after pressing the matter with concerned officials. Even then, he was kept behind an additional partition that did not allow him access to the meeting as agreed.

For some inexplicable reason, despite her repeated requests, the shoes of the wife of Shri Jadhav were not returned to her after the meeting. We would caution against any mischievous intent in this regard.

From the feedback we have received of the meeting, it appears that Shri Jadhav was under considerable stress and speaking in an atmosphere of coercion.

Most of his remarks were clearly tutored and designed to perpetuate the false narrative of his alleged activities in Pakistan. His appearance also raises questions of his health and well being.

We also regret that contrary to assurances, the overall atmosphere of the meeting was intimidating insofar as family members were concerned. Family members, however, handled the situation with great courage and fortitude.

The manner in which the meeting was conducted and its aftermath was clearly an attempt to bolster a false and unsubstantiated narrative of Shri Jadhav’s alleged activities. You would all agree that this exercise lacked any credibility."

Kulbhushan Jadhav's mother and wife met External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj in Delhi on Tuesday; the three hour meeting was also attended by foreign secretary S Jaishankar and other officers of the Ministry, according to media reports.

Jadhav, a former Navy officer, is lodged in Pakistan jail since March last year on alleged charges of espionage on behalf of RAW, a claim that India has denied all along. He was arrested for allegedly entering Pakistan from Iran, according to media reports.

His death sentence is on hold for now after India filed an appeal against the conviction in the International Court of Justice and secured a stay in May this year.

According to media reports, Pakistan has filed a counter-memorial in the ICJ.