January 21, 2025 05:57 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Donald Trump sworn in as 47th president of United States | Kolkata court sentences convict Sanjoy Roy to life imprisonment in RG Kar rape-murder case | Supreme Court stays proceedings against Rahul Gandhi in defamation case over remarks against Amit Shah and BJP | Invasion of our borders will come to a halt: Donald Trump promises crackdown on immigration ahead of inauguration | Kolkata court convicts civic volunteer Sanjoy Roy in RG Kar rape-murder case | Saif was stabbed repeatedly, he tried to protect Taimur and Jeh: Kareena Kapoor Khan records statement with police | Escaped death by 20-25 minutes: Sheikh Hasina alleges opposition wanted to kill her | Cabinet's decision on 8th Pay Commission will improve quality of life, give boost to consumption: PM Modi | 'It has been an incredibly challenging day': Kareena Kapoor Khan requests privacy after Saif Ali Khan's stabbing incident | 'Distorting history': Mamata slams Mohan Bhagwat over his Ram Temple consecration 'marking true independence' remark
Kashmir
Image Credit: UNI

Kashmir: After a halt for over 10 years, HC allows Nadimarg Kashmiri Pandit massacre trial

| @indiablooms | Oct 29, 2022, at 11:01 pm

Srinagar/UNI: The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court Saturday allowed the revision petition of J&K Police in the 2003 Nadimarg Kashmiri Pandit massacre case.

The case relates to the massacre of 24 Kashmiri Pandits by militant groups at Nadimarg village in Shopian district on Mar 23, 2003.

The dead included 11 men, 11 women and two children.

The High Court has ordered the trial court to ensure expeditious proceedings so as to conclude the matter at the earliest.

With this order, the trial of Nadimarg Kashmiri Pandit massacre case which was halted in 2011 will resume after 11 years.

Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul in the judgment ordered that the revision petition be allowed and the order dated Feb 9, 2011 passed by the court be set-aside.

The application for issuance of commission for examination of witnesses moved by the prosecution-State/petitioner has also been allowed.

"The court below (Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Shopian) shall now take all the necessary measures for ensuring the examination of the witnesses concerned by issuing commission and/or recording their statement video conferencing and shall ensure expeditious proceedings so as to conclude the matter at the earliest," the order read.

The main accused of the Nadimarg massacre case Zia Mustafa, a Lashkar-e-Taiba militant from Pakistan was killed on Oct 24, 2021 near the Line of Control in Poonch district of Jammu region.

Mustafa had spent the last 18 years in jail and was moved to Jammu’s Kot Bhalwal jail in 2018.

In October last year, Mustafa was brought to Mendhar on a 10-day remand from jail to help security forces identify a "terrorist hideout" in Mendhar.

When forces approached the hideout, police said, the infiltrators opened fire, injuring two policemen, a jawan and Mustafa.

The body of Mustafa was retrieved later.

On Apr 18, 2003, the three other Pakistani militants accused in the massacre case were killed in an encounter in south Kashmir.

The challan was filed against seven accused persons initially before the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Pulwama.

The case was later transferred to the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Shopian.

The case was closed when some witnesses moved out of the Kashmir Valley and the prosecution filed "moved an application before the trial court seeking permission to examine material prosecution witnesses on commission".

The trial court dismissed the application.

The prosecution challenged it in the high court and in 2011, it too dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition of the prosecution.

This year in August, the high court restored the revision petition of the State which had been dismissed in December 2011 for non-prosecution.

Justice Koul on Saturday said he was of the view that the court below has dismissed the application of the prosecution-State for examining the witness on commission on the irrelevant consideration while overlooking the material and relevant aspects of the case.

"The said application of the prosecution for recording statements of witnesses on commission deserved to be allowed," the judge observed.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.