November 24, 2024 19:54 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Mahayuti routs MVA in Maharashtra, INDIA retains Jharkhand; Priyanka's triumphant poll debut | How can Mahayuti win over 200 seats? Sanjay Raut cries foul over Maharashtra mandate | 'Third World War has begun:' Ex-Ukraine military commander-in-chief Valery Zaluzhny | UK-India Free Trade Agreement negotiations to resume in early 2024 | UK can arrest Benjamin Netanyahu if he visits country based on ICC warrant | Centre to send over 10,000 additional soldiers to violence-hit Manipur amid fresh violence | Chhattisgarh: 10 Maoists killed during encounter with security forces in Sukma | Baba Siddique murder case: Arrested Akashdeep Gill used a labourer's hotspot to evade tracking, say police | Donald Trump picks 'smart and tough' Pam Bondi as new US Attorney General after Matt Gaetz withdraws | Canadian government denies media report that claims PM Modi knew of Khalistani leader Nijjar's killing
Khalistan

Khalistan: A political charade, nothing more

| @indiablooms | Sep 15, 2024, at 11:41 am

The Khalistan movement, a separatist ideology advocating for an independent Sikh state, has often been portrayed as a manifestation of Sikh aspirations. However, a closer examination reveals a stark disconnect between the movement’s objectives and the fundamental principles of Sikhi, the faith founded by Guru Nanak Dev Ji.

Sikhi, at its core, is a religion of peace, harmony, and universal brotherhood. Guru Nanak Dev Ji’s teachings emphasized the oneness of humanity, the rejection of discrimination based on caste or creed, and the pursuit of spiritual enlightenment. The principles of ‘Naam’, ‘Kirat’, and ‘Kar Seva’ – remembrance of God, honest work, and selfless service – form the pillars of the Sikh faith.

The Khalistan movement, on the other hand, stands in stark contrast to these core tenets. Its roots lie in a sense of grievance and marginalization, leading to a desire for separation and self-rule.

“More than anything else, Khalistan is a project for bringing about the destruction of the Indian state in a welter of communal disturbances…”

Holy War Against India, Connor Cruise O’Brien, 1988

Moreover, the Khalistan movement’s methods have often been violent and divisive. The movement’s resort to militancy and violence directly contradicts the Sikh principles of non-violence and compassion. The indiscriminate killings, extortion, and other acts of violence perpetrated by some Khalistani militants have tarnished the image of Sikhism and caused immense suffering among both Sikhs and non-Sikhs alike.

During the 1980s and 1990s, the Khalistan movement reached its zenith, marked by a violent campaign that encompassed bombings, assassinations, kidnappings, and the targeted killing and massacres of both Sikh and Hindu civilians. This tumultuous period led to a staggering toll of nearly 22,000 lives lost, with approximately 12,000 casualties among civilians.

The conflict then gained an international dimension in 1985 when Khalistani separatists, based in Canada, orchestrated a devastating bomb explosion aboard an Air India flight traveling from Toronto to New Delhi. This tragic event claimed the lives of all 329 Canadian individuals on board, including 82 children below the age of 13, making it the deadliest terrorist attack in Canadian history.

The Khalistan movement’s separatist agenda also clashes with Sikhi’s emphasis on universal brotherhood. Sikhi teaches that all humanity is connected, regardless of religious or ethnic background. The movement’s focus on creating an exclusive Sikh state runs counter to this principle of inclusivity and undermines the Sikh ideal of ‘Vasai Kharadi’, living peacefully and harmoniously with all.

Khalistanis in Canada, the US, and other countries have used the Khalistan separatist agenda to gain political clout and influence. By organizing protests, rallies, and other events, they drum up issues of the long past, which have no relevance or bearing for today’s generation. They also leverage their financial resources to support candidates and parties that are willing to support their agenda, for votes of the community. As a result, several Khalistanis have been elected to public office, where they have used their positions to advance their agenda. For example, in Canada, several Khalistani-backed politicians have secured seats in the House of Commons and provincial legislatures. These politicians have used their platforms to advocate for and justify Khalistan extremism, and to criticize the Indian government. In the US, Khalistanis have also been active in local politics, and they have successfully lobbied for resolutions supporting Khalistan.

The Khalistan movement’s political aspirations are however at odds with Sikhi’s emphasis on spiritual liberation. Sikhi encourages its followers to focus on their inner journey of spiritual growth and enlightenment, rather than seeking worldly power and control. The movement’s preoccupation with establishing a political state diverts attention from the core spiritual principles of Sikhi.

The Khalistan movement, with its emphasis on separation, violence, and political power, stands in stark contrast to the fundamental principles of Sikhi. Guru Nanak Dev Ji’s teachings of peace, harmony, and universal brotherhood are not reflected in the movement’s objectives and methods. Sikhi, as a religion of compassion and inclusivity, cannot be used to justify separatism and violence. True Sikhism lies in upholding the values of ‘Naam’, ‘Kirat’, and ‘Kar Seva’, fostering unity and harmony within society, and pursuing spiritual enlightenment.

(Image and text courtesy: Khalsavox.com)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.