March 23, 2025 03:05 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Lower representation in Parliament will weaken states' political strength: Stalin at delimitation meeting | Lower representation in Parliament will weaken states' political strength: Stalin at delimitation meeting | MK Stalin hosts mega multi-state meeting on delimitation in Chennai, BJP calls it drama | Cash pile accused Justice Yashwant Varma was named in CBI's FIR for alleged corruption, SC junked it later | London: Heathrow Airport resumes operation after substation fire causes power disruption | Bangladesh interim government not planning to ban Sheikh Hasina's Awami League | Fire at Delhi HC judge's house leads to recovery of unaccounted cash, SC collegium acts | Indian researcher Badar Khan Suri won't be deported from US over alleged Hamas link, orders judge | Donald Trump signs order to start dismantling US Education Department | Finland is world's happiest country, India slightly improves its happiness quotient with 118th position
Image Credit: IBNS File

MP, MLA disqualification: Role of Speaker slammed by Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Jan 21, 2020, at 08:08 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Parliament may seriously consider amending the Constitution to substitute the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or Legislative Assemblies as the arbiter of disputes concerning disqualification which arise under the Tenth Schedule.

It asked Parliament to rethink, if Speaker, who is also affiliated to a party, should decide disqualification petitions of Members of Parliament or Legislative Assemblies.

A bench, headed by Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman, ruled that a permanent body with a proper mechanism should be set up to adjudge the cases of disqualification of lawmakers.

The apex court held that Parliament should think over having an independent and permanent body to decide disqualification petitions against MPs and MLAs, instead of the Speaker retaining exclusive powers.

The verdict came on a petition filed by one K Meghachandra Singh.

It is time, the Supreme Court ruled, that Parliament have a rethink on whether disqualification petitions ought to be entrusted to the quasi-judicial authority of Speaker who continues to belong to a particular political party either de jure or de facto.

Image Credit: IBNS File

 

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu