December 16, 2024 21:59 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
GRAP 4 restrictions reimposed in Delhi as air quality dips to 'severe' category | 39 ministers included in Devendra Fadnavis-led Maharashtra cabinet | People who raise questions on EVMs should show how they can be hacked: TMC trashes Congress claims | Bangladesh likely to hold national polls in late 2025 or early 2026, says Yunus in Victory Day speech | Constitution stood test of time: Nirmala Sitharaman in Rajya Sabha | PM Museum requests Rahul Gandhi to return Pandit Nehru's historical letters | Indian tabla maestro Zakir Hussain dies at 73 in San Francisco, confirms family | Kolkata woman strangled, beheaded and chopped into pieces for refusing brother-in-law's advances | Arvind Kejriwal, CM Atishi to contest Delhi polls from current constituencies | Atul Subhash suicide case: Wife Nikita, her mother and brother arrested
SC
Image: UNI

New farm laws: Supreme Court asks Centre to file reply

| @indiablooms | Oct 12, 2020, at 10:06 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday sought a reply from the Centre on petitions challenging the new farm-related laws.

The bench, headed by Chief Justice of India S A Bobde, took three petitions--one filed by advocate M L Sharma, other by Chhattisgarh Kisan Congress and the third by DMK MP Tiruchi Seva.

During the hearing, Advocate K Parameshar, appearing for the Congress, told the court that the new laws will do away with mandi system.

To this, the CJI asked the petitioner to knock the doors of respective High Courts, for which the advoted replied that High Courts may pass conflicting judgments leading to more chaos.

The CJI then asked the Attorney General to file a reply on the petitions. The Attorney General, agreeing with the court, said the reply will be filed by the Centre within six weeks.

As per the news laws, the farmers will now be able to sell their produce outside mandis or private players can buy directly from farmers. The laws provide a legal framework for contract farming. Lastly, stock limits and price control over food items like cereals, pulses, onions, edible oilseeds and oils under Essential Commodities Act have been removed.

The petitions claim that the new laws will do away with the Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) that ensured fair prices for farmers' produce and small and marginal farmers will be left at the mercy of corporate players.

It also claims that the laws are unconstitutional as "only States" have power to make or amend laws related to agriculture and its trade as it is the State Subject under Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. Parliament acted against federalism by encroaching upon the powers of the State, the petition filed by the DMK MP said.

The law violates Article 14 (equality before the law), 21 (Protection of life and personal liberty), 23 (Prohibition of forced labour), the petition filed by Kisan Congress Chhattishgrah said. It also said as many farmers belong to Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe communities, the new laws will take away the protection under fifth and sixth schedule.

The laws lead to widespread protests by farmers, their unions and organisations, activists and opposition at several states, and more concentrated in Punjab and Haryana. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.