March 31, 2025 11:11 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Eleven coaches of Bangalore-Kamakhya AC Superfast Express derail in Odisha, 1 dies | Telangana man marries two women in same ceremony after falling in love with both | Vladimir Putin says Russia won't interfere in Donald Trump's plans to 'take over' Greenland | India ready to offer possible assistance: PM Modi on Myanmar, Thailand earthquake | Magnitude 7.7 Earthquake hits Myanmar, strong tremors felt in Bangkok | 'Complete lawlessness': Suvendu Adhikari writes to Bengal Guv over Malda violence | 'You are a liar': Mamata Banerjee faces guests' ire over Singur, RG Kar, 'attack on Hindus' at London event | 3 cops killed, 2 terrorists shot dead during J&K's Kathua encounter: Report | Kolkata couple sues IVF centre for not revealing daughter's biological parents' identity, blames it for her death | 'India is not Dharamshala', Amit Shah says as Lok Sabha passes Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025
Image: Wikipedia/Bollywood Hungama

Rajinikanth's wife Latha to face trial in Rs. 6.20 cr fraud case: Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Jul 10, 2018, at 06:32 pm

New Delhi, July 10 (IBNS): Setting aside the Karnataka High Court's order, the Supreme Court on Tuesday said actor-politician Rajinikanth's wife Latha will have to face trial in a fraud case amounting to Rs. 6.20 cr, media reports said.

According to reports, Latha failed to clear the dues of Rs. 6.20 cr to advertising firm Ad Bureau.

A loan of Rs. 10 cr was taken from the advertising firm for the post-production work of Rajinikanth and Deepika Padukone starrer film Kochadaiiyaan, which released in 2014.

The firm had later alleged that Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd., in which Latha is the director, did not refund Rs. 6.20 cr.

Mediaone was about to pay Rs. 10 cr along with guaranteed profit of Rs. 1. 20 cr to the advertising firm.

The matter moved to the Karnataka High Court, which had cancelled all legal proceedings against Latha by stating the case is not about fraud but breach of agreement.

In February, the top court had asked Latha to pay the pending amount within three months.

Latha was pulled up by the apex court last week after she failed to clear the dues within the fixed time frame.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu