April 09, 2025 01:48 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After end of deadline, White House confirms 104 percent tariffs on China: Reports | Congress to undergo major organisational reshuffle, says KC Venugopal | Supreme Court raps TN Guv RN Ravi for withholding assent to 10 key bills, MK Stalin calls verdict 'historic | Waqf Law comes into effect, Supreme Court to hear petitions against it on April 16 | Tamil Nadu Guv withholding assent to 10 key bills 'illegal' and 'arbitrary': Supreme Court | Telangana to act against Dia Mirza, Dhruv Rathee over 'AI clips' of tree felling in Kancha Gachibowli: Report | Relief for Mamata govt as Supreme Court rejects CBI probe into creation of supernumerary posts in schools | CJI Sanjiv Khanna to decide on listing pleas challenging Waqf (Amendment) Act | Mamata Banerjee backs Bengal teachers who lost jobs, says she has plans to accommodate them | Drunk filmmaker Siddhant Das rams car into Kolkata market, one killed, several injured
K Kavitha
Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

Supreme Court grants no interim relief to BRS leader K Kavitha in Delhi excise policy case

| @indiablooms | Mar 28, 2023, at 02:11 am

New Delhi/IBNS/UNI: The Supreme Court Monday did not grant any interim relief to Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leader and daughter of Telangana Chief Minister K Kavitha in relation to the summons issued by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in the alleged Delhi excise policy scam case.

A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice Ajay Rastogi and also comprising Justice Bela M Trivedi, did not pass any interim order of relief to Kavitha and posted the case for further hearing after 3 weeks.

Kavitha, who is a Member of Legislative Council in Telanagan, had moved the Supreme Court challenging the summons issued against her by the ED in connection with the Delhi excise policy scam case.

Kavitha had meanwhile, before the hearing, already appeared before the ED thrice in the Delhi Excise Policy scam case at the ED office.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Kavitha, said that issues concerning the place of interrogation etc. need to be addressed.

"Whether she needs to be interrogated at home or in Delhi, Court is seized of and has issued notice in similar petitions of Nalini Chidambaram and Abhishek Banerjee," Sibal said.

While not inclined to pass any order and refusing to stay the ED summons against her, the Supreme Court, however, agreed to examine the issue of the legal point as to if a woman can be summoned to the ED Office under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and or Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) of Indian laws.

The top court, while refusing to pass any interim relief to Kavitha, engaged her plea along with the earlier one of Nalini Chidambaram pending before it.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu