April 08, 2025 06:30 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Tamil Nadu Guv withholding assent to 10 key bills 'illegal' and 'arbitrary': Supreme Court | Telangana to act against Dia Mirza, Dhruv Rathee over 'AI clips' of tree felling in Kancha Gachibowli: Report | Relief for Mamata govt as Supreme Court rejects CBI probe into creation of supernumerary posts in schools | CJI Sanjiv Khanna to decide on listing pleas challenging Waqf (Amendment) Act | Mamata Banerjee backs Bengal teachers who lost jobs, says she has plans to accommodate them | Drunk filmmaker Siddhant Das rams car into Kolkata market, one killed, several injured | Kunal Kamra moves Bombay High Court, seeks quashing of FIR over Eknath Shinde parody | Amit Shah briefs BJP MLAs in his three-day Jammu and Kashmir visit | Bengal BJP leaders participate in Ram Navami rallies across state | PM Modi to inaugurate new Pamban Rail Bridge, connecting Rameswaram to Indian mainland, today
Nuh violence

Supreme Court interrupts bench to hear petition related to Nuh violence

| @indiablooms | Aug 03, 2023, at 01:52 am

New Delhi: In an unprecedented move, the Supreme Court on Wednesday interrupted a hearing by a bench that can rule on Constitutional matters to hear a petition seeking a ban on rallies held by right-wing groups Bajrang Dal and Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), NDTV reported.

The bench comprising at least five judges was interrupted as Chief Justice DY Chandrachud rostered an urgent hearing for a petition on the riots in Haryana's Nuh district on Wednesday, said the report.

The bench was discussing now rescinded Article 370, which gave special rights to the erstwhile state of Jammu Kashmir.

On Wednesday morning, CU Singh, the lawyer representing petitioner journalist Shaheen Abdullah, sought an expedited hearing from Justice Aniruddha Bose, in the aftermath of the violence that resulted in six fatalities, including two security personnel, and caused extensive vandalism and arson, the report said.

Following the advice of Justice Bose to approach Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, Singh presented the case before him, stressing the urgency of immediate intervention after the violence that occurred, resulting in six fatalities, including two security personnel, and widespread vandalism and arson.

At first, the Chief Justice was asked to consider the case in the morning, but during lunchtime, CU Singh reiterated the urgency of the matter.

In response, Chief Justice Chandrachud, leading the Constitution bench, examined the application's documents in his chamber and promptly formed a special bench comprising Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice SVN Bhatti, instructing the registry to list the matter for hearing at 2 pm, the report said citing sources.

Justice Sanjiv Khanna, a member of the Constitution bench, participated in the Nuh case hearing, which concluded at 2:15 pm. The Constitution bench resumed the hearing on Article 370 at 2:20 pm.

In response to the petition regarding the Nuh situation, the Supreme Court issued directives to both the Central and state governments to take preventive measures against any hate speech or violence during marches organized by the VHP and Bajrang Dal following the communal clashes in Nuh.

Justices Sanjiv Khanna and SV Bhatti ordered the deployment of additional police or paramilitary forces and the installation of CCTV cameras in sensitive areas.

The communal violence in Nuh resulted in six deaths, including two home guards, when a mob attempted to halt a VHP procession on July 31.

In response to the situation, the state government has arrested 116 people and the VHP and Bajrang Dal have organized 23 demonstrations across the National Capital Region (NCR).

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu