April 20, 2025 08:51 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Narendra Modi to visit Saudi Arabia next week, deepening multi-faceted partnership on agenda | Trump says US will 'take a pass' on Russia-Ukraine peace talks if parties make it difficult | Andhra student dies in accident in US' Texas days before her graduation | Karnataka students allegedly forced to remove sacred threads at CET exam centre, sparks outrage | Bengal BJP leader Dilip Ghosh marries party colleague Rinku Majumdar in an intimate ceremony today | Narendra Modi, Elon Musk discuss Indo-US tech collaboration | 'Focus on protecting rights of own minorities': India slams Bangladesh's remark on Murshidabad riots | Gangster Harpreet Singh, alias Happy Passia, responsible for Punjab terror attacks arrested in US | No change in 'waqf by user' for now till next hearing: Supreme Court to Centre | Supreme Court rules Bengal govt teachers 'not identified as tainted' in SSC scam can continue till fresh appointments
UP cop mistakenly names judge as accused in theft case. Photo courtesy: Representational/Pixabay

UP cop mistakenly names judge as 'accused' in arrest warrant of a theft case, gets suspended

| @indiablooms | Apr 15, 2025, at 12:53 am

Firozabad/IBNS: A police officer in Uttar Pradesh's Firozabad was suspended after he mistakenly named a judge in the arrest warrant for theft.

According to reports, the judge ordered the cop to issue a non-bailable warrant against a man who was accused of theft.

Instead of listing the accused, the police officer 'mistakenly' named the judge in the warrant.

The cop has been suspended, and the judge, surprised to see his name in the warrant, has ordered an inquiry against the cop for the "grave" error.

Sub-inspector Banwari Lal, who was posted at Thana Uttar, named Judge Nagma Khan in the warrant instead of Rajkumar, the accused against whom the judge had initially ordered a non-bailable warrant.

The cop in his report said the "accused" was not found at the location during the execution of the warrant.

Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Saurabh took action after the error surfaced.

The district police chief said he ordered the sub-inspector to be sent to police lines and directed an inquiry into the incident to determine the reason behind the "grave" error.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu