Why PM 'mum' on China’s 'illegal incursion' near Doklam: Congress targets Modi
New Delhi/UNI: Congress general secretary Randeep Singh Surjewala on Thursday hit out at the Centre over China’s “illegal incursion” in the Bhutanese territory near Doklam and alleged that it is a “blow” to India's national security.
“Why the PM mum? Who will defend National Security,” Randeep Singh Surjewala said in a tweet on Thursday.
“100 sqkm of land grab & illegal incursion and setting 4 new villages by #China in #Bhutan, next to Doklam is a blow to India’s National Security,” he said.
100 Square KMs of “land grab” & illegal incursion and setting 4 new villages by #China in #Bhutan, next to Doklam is a blow to India’s “National Security”.
— Randeep Singh Surjewala (@rssurjewala) November 18, 2021
This happened between May-Nov 2021.
• Why is PM ‘mum’?
• Who will defend National Security?https://t.co/Ez1029RVHO
Surjewala alleged that this happened between May-Nov 2021.
The Congress leader also shared the satellite pictures which purportedly show the construction of Chinese villages in Bhutanese territory and the military deployment.
On Wednesday, a Twitter handle by the name d-atis @detresfa tagged global researcher The Intel Lab, and tweeted pictures of Chinese activities inside the Bhutanese territory near Doklam.
“Disputed land between #Bhutan China near Doklam shows construction activity between 2020-21, multiple new villages spread through an area roughly 100 sqkm now dot the landscape, is this part of a new agreement or enforcement of #China’s territorial claim?”
"#China's development of a network of large heliports across the Tibetan Plateau & along its tense border with #India that can be of major use in a crisis,” @detresfa tweeted.
Support Our Journalism
We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism
IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.