December 16, 2024 05:56 (IST)

Make this your homepage

Foreign

Kolkata woman strangled, beheaded and chopped into pieces for refusing brother-in-law's advances | Arvind Kejriwal, CM Atishi to contest Delhi polls from current constituencies | Atul Subhash suicide case: Wife Nikita, her mother and brother arrested | Pushpa 2 stampede: Allu Arjun walks out of jail, actor's lawyer slams delay in release | Donald Trump intends to end 'inconvenient' and 'very costly' Daylight Saving Time | Suchir Balaji: Indian-origin former OpenAI researcher found dead at US apartment | Bengaluru techie suicide: Karnataka Police issues summons to wife Nikita, her family members | French President Macron appoints centrist leader Francois Bayrou as new Prime Minister | Congress always prioritised personal interest over Constitution: Rajnath Singh | Jaishankar calls attack on Hindus in Bangladesh 'a source of concern'

Credit: OHCHR

UN urges Lithuania to reverse political ban on ex-president

India Blooms News Service | | Apr 10, 2014, at 04:56 pm

#United Nations # Lithuania # political ban # Rolandas Paksas # abuse of power

New York, Apr 10 (IBNS): The United Nations expert body monitoring civil and political rights found on Wednesday that Lithuania violated the rights of its ex-president, Rolandas Paksas, by introducing a rule banning impeached officials from holding high office - just weeks after he had been removed from his post for abuse of power.

The Geneva-based Committee, which monitors worldwide implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, considered a complaint brought by the former leader and found that Paksas could not have foreseen the ban, which was not in force when he was impeached.

Lithuania should overturn his lifelong disqualification from running for or holding high offices, including that of president, prime minister or minister – according to a news release issued by the Committee.

In April 2004, the Lithuanian Parliament removed Paksas from office, after its constitutional court found that he had unlawfully arranged Lithuanian citizenship for a Russian-born businessman.

In May that same year, the Parliament amended the electoral legislation to introduce the lifelong ban.

Paksas argued that the retroactively-applied amendment was introduced to target him. He called the lifelong ban unreasonable and disproportionate and adding that the Constitutional Court upholding the disqualification was biased.

The Lithuanian State said that the constitutional restrictions on Paksas were proportionate given the “gravity of the related breaches.”

The 18-member Committee concluded that when Parliament decided to remove the ex-president from office, “no legal provision expressly stated that he could be barred from standing for election as a result.”

“The lifelong disqualification to be a candidate in presidential elections, or to be prime minister or minister, were imposed on Paksas following a rule-making process highly linked in time and substance to the impeachment proceedings initiated against him,” the Committee said.

The Committee found that the lifelong disqualifications imposed on him could not have been foreseen and lacked objectivity – thereby amounting to an unreasonable restriction under article 25 (b) and (c) of the Covenant.

Article 25 states that: Every citizen shall have the right and the opportunity, without any of the distinctions mentioned in article 2 and without unreasonable restrictions (a) to take part in the conduct of public affairs, directly or through freely chosen representatives; and (b) To vote and to be elected at genuine periodic elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret ballot, guaranteeing the free expression of the will of the electors.

(Credit: OHCHR)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.