October 18, 2026 06:13 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Internet access a fundamental right for children': SC rejects age-based 'blanket' ban | 'We will fight our own government': RG Kar victim's father threatens fresh protest after Sandip Ghosh gets bail | RG Kar shocker: Sandip Ghosh gets bail as only 7 of 147 witnesses examined, junior doctor blasts CBI | Trump waives Russia-related sanctions | 'How dare Elon Musk?' Owaisi defends Modi after billionaire's 'real boss' jibe at Ambani | 'B****y S***': IAS officer's abuse of female colleague during virtual J&K meeting sparks row | Aamir Khan’s nephew Imran Khan asked to leave India by Oct 28 after joining anti-CEC protest | ‘Their crime? Demanding justice’: Rahul Gandhi slams 4 AM detention of Ankita Bhandari’s parents | ‘Bangladesh showed us the way’: Neha Bora’s remarks spark BJP attack on Rahul Gandhi | Chingrighata flyover skid scare: Bikes fall, anti-skid blocks installed overnight as Bengal Minister Agnimitra Paul faces criticism
Gautam Adani X handle

Bombay HC clears Gautam and Rajesh Adani in Rs 388 cr market violation case

| @indiablooms | Mar 18, 2025, at 11:56 pm

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Monday discharged Adani Group Chairman Gautam Adani and Managing Director Rajesh Adani from a case involving alleged market regulation violations amounting to nearly ₹388 crore, The Economic Times reported.

The case, filed in 2012 by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), accused Adani Enterprises Limited (AEL) and its promoters of criminal conspiracy and cheating.

In 2019, Gautam and Rajesh Adani petitioned the Bombay HC to quash a sessions court ruling that had declined to discharge them from the case.

Justice R N Laddha’s bench overturned the sessions court's order on Monday, effectively exonerating the Adanis.

The SFIO had initially charged 12 individuals, including the Adanis, in 2012. A magistrate’s court in Mumbai had discharged them in May 2014, but the SFIO challenged this decision.

In November 2019, a sessions court reinstated the charges, arguing that the SFIO had presented a case of alleged unlawful gains by the Adani Group.

The Adanis later contested this ruling in the High Court, calling it "arbitrary and illegal."

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.