October 17, 2026 10:12 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'How dare Elon Musk?' Owaisi defends Modi after billionaire's 'real boss' jibe at Ambani | 'B****y S***': IAS officer's abuse of female colleague during virtual J&K meeting sparks row | Aamir Khan’s nephew Imran Khan asked to leave India by Oct 28 after joining anti-CEC protest | ‘Their crime? Demanding justice’: Rahul Gandhi slams 4 AM detention of Ankita Bhandari’s parents | ‘Bangladesh showed us the way’: Neha Bora’s remarks spark BJP attack on Rahul Gandhi | Chingrighata flyover skid scare: Bikes fall, anti-skid blocks installed overnight as Bengal Minister Agnimitra Paul faces criticism | Meerut blue drum murder case: Muskaan, her lover get death sentence | 'Rise up, young patriots!': American singer Mary Millben alleges CJP gets US funding, urges peaceful protests | 'Won't go unchallenged': Muhammad Yunus heckling in New York triggers legal action warning | flydubai cockpit attack probe widens: Two Maldivian pilots detained in UAE over links to Omani co-pilot
Photo: Wikimedia Commons | Donald Trump Instagram

Fareed Zakaria slams Trump’s 50% tariff on India as baffling reversal of US foreign policy

| @indiablooms | Aug 12, 2025, at 08:41 pm

US President Donald Trump’s 50% tariff on Indian imports is “puzzling” and a “reversal of 25 years of American foreign policy,” political commentator and author Fareed Zakaria has said, warning that the move makes “no sense” and could trigger a global oil shock.

In an interview with News18, Zakaria argued that if India and China stopped purchasing Russian oil, crude prices could spike to $150 a barrel, dealing a blow to global economies.

He described Trump’s decision as an illogical break from a bipartisan strategy, dating back to the Clinton era, that had forged closer ties with India.

"It's puzzling what Trump is doing. It is a reversal of really 25 years of American foreign policy. If you go back to the Clinton administration after the Cold War, a strategic decision was made that the United States wanted to be closer to India," the author said.

Zakaria noted that successive US administrations over the past two decades had viewed India as a crucial geopolitical and economic partner in Asia.

"Trump is really reversing 25 years of bipartisan American foreign policy that saw a new strategic alliance with India as in the United States's vital national interest both geopolitically and geoeconomically," he added.

The 50% tariff, due to take effect on August 27, is aimed at penalising India for buying Russian oil.

However, Zakaria pointed out that China purchases more Russian oil than India, making the justification “flawed.”

"The excuse for the highly punitive tariffs—the buying of Russian oil—makes no sense because China buys more oil than India does," he pointed out.

"If India and China didn't buy Russian oil," he further said, "oil would be $150 a barrel because you would have taken all that supply off the market, it would cause a recession in the Western world, it would cause a recession in America—and Trump surely doesn't want to do that."

He praised the Biden administration’s price-cap strategy, which pushed Russia to sell oil at a discount while maintaining global supply and avoiding a revenue windfall for President Vladimir Putin.

Zakaria also suggested Trump’s move could be driven by personal motives.

"It's highly personalistic. We're dealing with somebody, it's almost like dealing with the dictator of a third-world country where the personal interests, the personal aggravations make a huge difference," he said.

He cited Trump’s dealings with Brazil as an example of grievance-driven policy.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.