August 02, 2026 03:45 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Kulgam terror attack turns deadlier: Second Chhattisgarh worker succumbs to bullet injuries | 'I'm ashamed': Girl who abused PM Modi during NEET protests issues apology | 'Abuses never solve anything': PM Modi urges forgiveness after Jantar Mantar protest slogans | 'Country wanted an apology, PM forgave it': Congress' sharp swipe at Modi's video over 'abuse' row | Bengal STF arrests JeM suspect from Burdwan; probe underway into 'plot' targeting CM Suvendu Adhikari | 'My father was almost lynched': Families of Delhi cops assaulted during NEET protests share chilling accounts | Nine killed after 'dangerous' building collapses in Maharashtra | Shehzad Poonawalla quits BJP, drops party name from X bio—big political twist | Meta India head Arun Srinivas booked over alleged anti-Modi posts during NEET protests | 'I received threats to join BJP': CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke's explosive allegation sparks fresh political row

Ayodhya Case: Supreme Court issues notice to elderly man for threatening lawyer

| @indiablooms | Sep 03, 2019, at 02:11 pm

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued a notice to an 88-year-old man from Tamil Nadu for threatening a senior advocate for appearing on behalf of the Sunni Waqf Board and other Muslim parties in the Ayodhya land dispute case.

A five-judge Constitution bench of the Apex Court, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi, issued notice to retired education officer N Shanmugam and sought a detailed response after hearing the contempt petition filed by Dr Rajeev Dhavan.

"This court issued notice to the respondent, Shanmugam. Let him file his detailed response on the entire issue. The contempt petition would be heard later," the bench said.

The court granted two weeks to Shanmugam to respond to the contempt petition.

Dhavan, in his petition, claimed that Shanmugam had allegedly cursed him for appearing on behalf of Muslim parties in the Ayodhya Ram Temple and Babri Masjid land (Title) dispute case.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.