August 16, 2026 11:26 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After SC rebuke, BCI chief apologises to NALSAR students over enrolment freeze row | Independence Day: PM Modi’s big youth pitch— AI training, free coaching amid exam row and job concerns | ‘Shakti Ki Saptadhara’: Modi reveals 7 pillars to power India’s next leap in his I-Day speech from Red Fort | West Bengal STF arrests 3 more suspected Pakistani spies in Cooch Behar | Bengal man arrested in Bengaluru over terror links, Afghanistan travel plan | Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe

Delhi HC accepts Greenpeace India's writ petition, directs MHA to respond

| | May 19, 2015, at 03:08 am
New Delhi, May 18 (IBNS): The Delhi High Court on Monday agreed to rule on Greenpeace India's legal challenge to the Ministry of Home Affairs' (MHA) decision to suspend its FCRA license and block the group's international and national bank accounts.
The court issued notices to MHA and several Indian banks calling on them to respond to Greenpeace India’s writ petition, which is to be heard on May 26.  
 
“We believe we have a strong case,” said Samit Aich, Executive Director, Greenpeace India. “We’re calling for the order to be quashed because of the arbitrary and unconstitutional way the MHA has acted. Freezing both our national and international bank accounts is beyond the scope of the Foreign Contributions Regulations Act (FCRA) and the jurisdiction of the MHA.”
 
In court on Monday, the judge asked Greenpeace India to declare what resources it would need to continue to function normally until August. Greenpeace India is currently collating this information and will provide it imminently.
 
Aich continued: “Our national bank accounts contain donations from thousands of Indian citizens, who give as little as Rs 350 a month. Because they’re blocked, we’ve had to scale back our campaigns on things like air pollution and solar street lighting. Our staff and their families are facing an uncertain future, but are showing amazing passion and spirit.”
 
Greenpeace argues that the MHA’s actions show evidence of ‘bad faith’ and are an attempt to silence Greenpeace India because of its high profile campaigns in areas like coal mining, air pollution and the use of pesticides in agriculture.
 
The Delhi High Court has also called on three major Indian banks to respond - IDBI Bank, Yes Bank and ICICI Bank. Greenpeace India’s petition claims that these banks did not have the right to freeze the accounts without a court order and their actions represent a breach of trust.
 
In a separate case on January 20, the Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Greenpeace India, ordering the government to release €235,000 to Greenpeace India, which the court said had been blocked ‘arbitrarily and unconstitutionally’ in June 2014. In March, the court also overturned Priya Pillai’s travel ban, which was also orchestrated by the MHA.  
 
“This is not about Greenpeace India alone. This is about the government trying to silence those who raise uncomfortable questions and shine a light on the destruction of India’s environment and the violation of Indian laws to benefit a powerful few. Greenpeace campaigns for a better, safer, just and more sustainable environment for Indians and people across the world."
 
We ask the Home Minister to address the issues we raise directly, instead of using these heavy handed measures that undermine the democratic values of our country,” said Aich.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.