October 22, 2026 03:12 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Delhi court releases CJP's Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka after 7 days in custody | ‘We are seeing what is happening outside our country’: Delhi HC judge’s remark as CJP leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka withdraw custody plea | Salman Khan was the original target? Tiger Shroff firing probe reveals shocking twist | ‘UN experts are an oxymoron’: Marco Rubio takes swipe at UN, refuses to comment on India's protests | ‘US ties with no country come at India's expense’: Marco Rubio addresses concerns over Pakistan, China | ‘Not meant to harm India’: Marco Rubio breaks silence on Trump’s tariff threat | Meloni makes Italian parents liable for children's vandalism after Milan riots: ‘Demonstrating is a right, devastating our cities is not’ | ‘Operation completed’: Tiger Shroff shooters allegedly alerted handlers after firing, probe reveals | 'I don't mind saying sorry 1,000 times': Sonu Nigam apologises to Kannadigas over ‘Pahalgam’ remark amid concert ban demand | After Vijay, is Dhanush eyeing politics? TVK calls Thalapathy an inspiration
Live-In
Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings against a man accused of rape.Photo courtesy: Wikimedia commons

Hard to believe a woman had physical intimacy with a man for 16 years on false marriage promise : Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Mar 06, 2025, at 03:29 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court has said it is hard to believe a woman had physical intimacy with a man in their live-in relationship for 16 years on false promise of marriage, media reports said.

The court made the observation while quashing a complaint against a bank official, who was accused by his live-in partner, a lecturer, of rape.

A Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta refused to accept the woman's plea after she claimed to have had sexual relationship with the banker on the false promise of marriage for 16 years.

"It is hard to believe that the complainant kept on bending to the demands of the appellant for a period of nearly 16 years without raising any protest to any quarter that the appellant was exploiting her sexually under the pretext of a false promise of marriage," the bench said as quoted by The Times of India.

"The prolonged period of 16 years during which the sexual relations continued unabatedly between the parties, is sufficient to conclude that there was never an element of force or deceit in the relationship," it added.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.