October 14, 2026 10:10 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Meerut blue drum murder case: Muskaan, her lover get death sentence | 'Rise up, young patriots!': American singer Mary Millben alleges CJP gets US funding, urges peaceful protests | 'Won't go unchallenged': Muhammad Yunus heckling in New York triggers legal action warning | flydubai cockpit attack probe widens: Two Maldivian pilots detained in UAE over links to Omani co-pilot | Netflix scores big FIFA deal: All 104 World Cup 2030 matches to stream live in Spain, Andorra | Jantar Mantar crackdown: CJP's Saurav Das, Ashutosh Ranka sent to jail for 5 days | Punjab activist confronts chemist over alleged drug sales, shot dead during Facebook Live | ‘Rahul Gandhi pushed me during protest march’: Pregnant journalist’s allegation sparks BJP-Congress faceoff | ‘You cannot denotify resistance': CJP leaders Ashutosh Ranka, Saurav Das jump Jantar Mantar gate to protest, detained | Delhi Police de-notifies Jantar Mantar as protest site amid CJP stir over Gyanesh Kumar
Khalistan

Khalistan unmasked: Violence in the name of faith

| @indiablooms | Nov 20, 2024, at 07:52 pm

The Khalistan movement, long mired in controversy and violence, has once again become a topic of heated debate.

Commentator Rohan Kumar Pall recently raised serious concerns about the intent and operation of this movement.

In his analysis, Pall described it as “driven by revenge and violence,” asserting that it bears no connection to the genuine concerns of the Sikh community.

While the Khalistan movement ostensibly seeks the creation of a separate Sikh state, it has strayed far from being merely a struggle for religious identity.

Pall characterized it as a political agenda pushed by a few extremist leaders. Specifically targeting figures such as Jagmeet Singh and Gurpatwant Singh Pannu, he accused them of exploiting the Sikh community’s name to bolster their political clout and secure foreign funding.

He also alleged that Pakistan provides financial and strategic backing to the movement, further revealing its dangerous motives.

The Khalistan movement has frequently been linked to violence.

The 1985 Air India bombing, which claimed 329 innocent lives, remains its most infamous act. Numerous other violent incidents involving Khalistani organizations have been reported both in India and abroad.

Pall argued that this movement not only threatens India’s unity but also aims to sow global instability.

Pall emphasized that the Sikh community is globally recognized for its values of peace, hard work, and religious devotion.

However, extremist leaders have severely tarnished this image.

He stressed the need for addressing the community’s legitimate grievances through peaceful and democratic means.

Instead of resolving Sikh issues, Pall argued, the Khalistan movement has only deepened their complexities.

The movement has also caused international tensions. In countries like Canada, the UK, and the US, Khalistani supporters have leveraged democratic platforms to promote extremist activities, subjecting these nations to criticism and scrutiny.

Pall’s message is clear: it is vital to distinguish between the Khalistan movement and the genuine aspirations of the Sikh community.

Rejecting violence and foreign interference, he called for dialogue and mutual respect as the pathway to resolving underlying issues.

Now is the time to draw a clear line between the legitimate demands of the Sikh community and the violent Khalistan agenda.

The essence of Sikhism lies in peace and hard work, and it must not be held hostage to any political scheme.

(Image and text courtesy: Khalsavox.com)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.