July 30, 2026 06:32 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Farmers storm Bhopal! Traffic crippled as protest over MSP intensifies | Supreme Court gives clean chit to Manmohan Singh in coal block scam case two years after death, accepts CBI closure report | Rahul Gandhi's 'student, idiot, andhbhakt' remark sparks uproar in Lok Sabha during anti-paper leak bill debate | Assam flood death toll climbs to 75; Over 3 lakh still affected as relief efforts intensify | 'You are simply useless': Kangana Ranaut hits back at CJP's Saurav Das in fresh Instagram attack | Assam floods: Death toll stays at 68 as over 5.24 lakh continue to battle deluge | 'Probe is meaningless if responsibility isn't fixed': Supreme Court slams Delhi Police over CJP protest crackdown | 'No protester will be left alone': CJP claims Centre shared FIR withdrawal copies after midnight talks | Bihar cop suspended after viral AK-47 firing video during NEET protest crackdown | After Dharmendra Pradhan's exit, 'E20 Janta Party' emerges, demands Nitin Gadkari's resignation over fuel policy
Prashant Bhushan

New SC bench to hear 2009 contempt case against Prashant Bhushan on Sept 10

| @indiablooms | Aug 26, 2020, at 01:33 am

New Delhi/UNI: A new bench of the Supreme Court will hear the 2009 contempt case, in which activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan allegedly made remarks calling half of 16 former Chief Justices 'corrupt', on Sept 10.

Apex Court bench, headed by Justice Arun Mishra on Tuesday said that since he is retiring on Sept 2, there is a paucity of time to address the questions which would require a lengthy hearing.

The bench agreed to refer to an appropriate bench the question of conflict between the right to free speech and suo moto contempt powers of the court in the 2009 contempt case against Bhushan, which was initiated for calling past Chief Justices as 'corrupt.'

Justice Mishra said, since Bhushan's counsel, Rajeev Dhavan has raised many questions, there is a paucity of time, otherwise we would have heard the senior counsel with respect to the questions which have been proposed.

"However, since the matter is pending for the last 10 years, as prayed for, we fix the date for Sept 10 before an appropriate Bench as may deem fit by the Chief Justice," the top court asserted.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.