August 06, 2026 11:01 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal sentenced to 10-year jail term in 2013 rape case as Bombay HC overturns acquittal | ‘Who brought a 12-year-old to protest?’ Advocate seeks POCSO case against CJP leaders | 'Unresponsive government': Jharkhand students escalate protest, demand CM Hemant Soren's exit | Former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal convicted in 2013 rape case as Bombay HC overturns acquittal | No rate cut! RBI keeps repo rate unchanged, sees 6.7% growth but warns inflation will rise | Free laptops, AI training, internships: Vijay government unveils youth-centric Tamil Nadu budget | Bangladesh asks media not to broadcast Sheikh Hasina's speech ahead of first public appearance from India | Kejriwal marches to PM Modi's residence over E20 petrol, alleges 'Trump pressure' behind policy | DMK slams Vijay government over Udhayanidhi's arrest, calls it 'blatant cowardice' | Tamil Nadu political storm: Udhayanidhi Stalin arrested after Trisha remark row

SC refuses to transfer AIADMK MLAs' disqualification case

| @indiablooms | Jun 27, 2018, at 12:52 pm

New Delhi, Jun 27 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to transfer from the Madras High Court the case pertaining to the disqualification of 18 AIADMK MLAs, media reports said.

A two-member vacation bench of justices Arun Mishra and SK Kaul, however, appointed Justice M Sathyanarayanan as the third judge in the Madras HC, to decide on the petition filed by 18 AIADMK MLAs against their disqualification.

The MLAs had sought transfer of their case from the Madras High Court to the Supreme Court after the split verdict by the high court on June 14.

While the Chief Justice of Madras HC Indira Banerjee upheld the disqualification order passed by Tamil Nadu Assembly Speaker P Dhanapal, Justice M Sundar quashed the speaker’s order for disqualification.

Justice Banerjee said in view of the contradicting judgements, the case will now be transferred to a different bench. The majority view would be considered the judgement.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.