July 31, 2026 09:05 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal STF arrests JeM suspect from Burdwan; probe underway into 'plot' targeting CM Suvendu Adhikari | 'My father was almost lynched': Families of Delhi cops assaulted during NEET protests share chilling accounts | Nine killed after 'dangerous' building collapses in Maharashtra | Shehzad Poonawalla quits BJP, drops party name from X bio—big political twist | Meta India head Arun Srinivas booked over alleged anti-Modi posts during NEET protests | 'I received threats to join BJP': CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke's explosive allegation sparks fresh political row | Assam floods turn deadlier: 78 killed, more than 3 lakh remain affected | Supreme Court orders Delhi govt to treat protesters injured by pellet guns during NEET march | Bengal: Birbhum cash haul soars to ₹28.5 crore, 15 kg gold seized; stone trader’s manager arrested | Blue out, saffron in: Hockey India breaks silence after jersey row erupts

Selection of candidates with criminal records can't be justified by their winnability: SC

| @indiablooms | Feb 13, 2020, at 02:20 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: In a major crackdown on the political parties, the Supreme Court on Thursday said the selection of candidates with criminal records can't be justified by their "winnability", media reports said.

In a bid to bring more transparency in the electoral process, the Supreme Court on Thursday asked all political parties to list the reasons behind giving tickets to candidates who have criminal cases against them.

The top court said the details of the candidates with criminal cases should be published in one local newspaper, one national newspaper and on social media including Facebook and Twitter. 

"Political parties will have to specify reasons for selecting candidates having pending criminal cases against them on their website," the court said. 

The apex court said on Thursday that the ability to win an election should not be a ruse to field a candidate with criminal records. "The reason to select candidates should be based on merit and not winnability. Winnability can't be the only justification," it said.

The top court also directed the parties to furnish a compliance report with the Election Commission. Failing which, a contempt proceeding will be initiated against the parties.

The verdict was passed on contempt petitions which were filed by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay and others.

Udpadhyay had filed the petition against the central government and the Election Commission (EC) alleging that despite court order, there were no steps taken to decriminalise politics.

During a hearing on Jan 24, the Supreme Court had admitted that its 2018 order to all political parties to publish details of candidates with criminal records failed to bring out the desired result to make decriminalise politics.   

Over 50 per cent of the newly-elected MLAs in the Delhi assembly elections, which were held recently, face serious criminal charges.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.