July 30, 2026 08:49 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'I received threats to join BJP': CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke's explosive allegation sparks fresh political row | Assam floods turn deadlier: 78 killed, more than 3 lakh remain affected | Supreme Court orders Delhi govt to treat protesters injured by pellet guns during NEET march | Bengal: Birbhum cash haul soars to ₹28.5 crore, 15 kg gold seized; stone trader’s manager arrested | Blue out, saffron in: Hockey India breaks silence after jersey row erupts | Ajinkya Rahane retires from international cricket: 'Melbourne hero' reveals what's next after Team India | 'I may look like young Hrithik Roshan': CJP's Saurav Das takes hilarious dig at Kangana Ranaut | Farmers storm Bhopal! Traffic crippled as protest over MSP intensifies | Supreme Court gives clean chit to Manmohan Singh in coal block scam case two years after death, accepts CBI closure report | Rahul Gandhi's 'student, idiot, andhbhakt' remark sparks uproar in Lok Sabha during anti-paper leak bill debate

Supreme Court refuses to stay Sharjeel Imam's prosecution in sedition cases

| @indiablooms | Jun 19, 2020, at 05:16 pm

New Delhi/UNI:  The Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay prosecution of JNU student Sharjeel Imam in sedition cases registered against him in five states for his alleged inflammatory speeches during anti-Citizenship Amendment Act protests.

A two-member bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and V Ramasubramanian was hearing a plea filed by Imam seeking to club all FIRs filed against him.

The Top Court was informed that governments of Delhi and Uttar Pradesh have filed their counter affidavits on Imam's plea but no responses have been filed by Assam, Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh.

"We cannot pass interim orders without seeing the replies of other states," the bench said.

"Let counter affidavits be filed by Manipur, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh in 2 weeks," the bench said and listed the matter for hearing after 3 weeks.

Earlier, senior advocate Siddharth Dave, appearing for Imam, contended that the court had on May 26, issued notice to Assam, Uttar Pradesh, Manipur & Arunachal Pradesh and Delhi seeking their respective detailed responses in the matter, which is still awaited.

Taking strong exception to Dave's assertion, the Uttar Pradesh government said it has already submitted its response to the Top Court.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said Delhi government's response is also ready and will be submitted by evening. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.