July 05, 2026 04:08 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Why can't citizens protest against the government? They are being made slaves by slapping cases': Bombay HC slams Mumbai Police, quashes activist's externment | 'First he cheats on me...': Siya Goyal's old pub video goes viral amid probe into fiancé Ketan Agarwal's alleged murder | Ronaldo's goal, Ramos' last-gasp winner send Portugal past Croatia, set up Spain clash | India-US trade deal almost done! Piyush Goyal hints at breakthrough | Ram Mandir donation scam: Champat Rai points finger at his own driver | PM Modi welcomes Japanese PM Sanae Takaichi as India-Japan ties enter a new era | 'Not an isolated incident': India slams Pakistan after 125-year-old historic Gurdwara is demolished | Ram Mandir donation theft: Six accused were employed by Varanasi-based security firm, probe reveals | Ayodhya Ram Temple donation theft: Probe says majority of money was allegedly stolen during Kumbh Mela | Commercial LPG price slashed by Rs 183.50 from July 1; check new rates in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai
Sonam Wangchuk
Sonam Wangchuk during Ladakh protests. Photo: Screen-grab/Sonam Wangchuk X video

‘We are in the AI era’: Supreme Court blasts Centre over ‘malicious’ Sonam Wangchuk transcript

| @indiablooms | Feb 17, 2026, at 11:16 am

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court of India on Monday pulled up the Centre over the detention of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, observing that there appeared to be “a certain malice” in the transcription of his speech, media reports said.

The top court criticised the government after noting that the transcript of Wangchuk’s three-minute speech had been expanded into a document running seven to eight minutes.

The remarks came during the hearing of a habeas corpus plea filed by his wife, Gitanjali Angmo.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Angmo, argued that several controversial phrases cited in the transcript — including “self-immolation of Ladakhis” and “overthrow the government” — were never spoken by Wangchuk.

Responding to the submissions, a bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and PB Varale questioned the authenticity of the transcription and asked the government to produce the original version of the speech.

Addressing Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, the bench said, as quoted by NDTV: “Mr Nataraj, we need the actual transcripts of these speeches. This is the basis on which the detention order is passed.”

The court further observed discrepancies between the transcript and the detention order, stating: “The tabular list you have filed, some of these things don’t even find a place in the detention order. There should be at least the correct transcript of what he says. There should not be a variance. If the speech is of three minutes and your transcription goes on for seven to eight minutes, there is certainly malice in that.”

When the ASG argued that the transcript had been prepared by the concerned department and that officials were “not experts,” the court responded sharply: “We are in the era of AI. Precision should be 98 per cent.”

Wangchuk was arrested for allegedly provoking a mob during protests demanding statehood for Ladakh. The agitation turned violent, resulting in the deaths of four protesters.

The protests were triggered in part by a hunger strike led by Wangchuk starting around September 10, 2025.

Additionally, two elderly protesters — 72-year-old Tsering Angchuk and 60-year-old Tashi Dolma — who had participated in an extended hunger strike, fell seriously ill and required hospitalisation.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.