October 15, 2026 09:45 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Aamir Khan’s nephew Imran Khan asked to leave India by Oct 28 after joining anti-CEC protest | ‘Their crime? Demanding justice’: Rahul Gandhi slams 4 AM detention of Ankita Bhandari’s parents | ‘Bangladesh showed us the way’: Neha Bora’s remarks spark BJP attack on Rahul Gandhi | Chingrighata flyover skid scare: Bikes fall, anti-skid blocks installed overnight as Bengal Minister Agnimitra Paul faces criticism | Meerut blue drum murder case: Muskaan, her lover get death sentence | 'Rise up, young patriots!': American singer Mary Millben alleges CJP gets US funding, urges peaceful protests | 'Won't go unchallenged': Muhammad Yunus heckling in New York triggers legal action warning | flydubai cockpit attack probe widens: Two Maldivian pilots detained in UAE over links to Omani co-pilot | Netflix scores big FIFA deal: All 104 World Cup 2030 matches to stream live in Spain, Andorra | Jantar Mantar crackdown: CJP's Saurav Das, Ashutosh Ranka sent to jail for 5 days
Several small businesses & US states challenged the Trump tariffs in the Supreme Court. Photo: ChatGPT.

Major setback for Trump! US Supreme Court invalidates tariffs, citing constitutional overreach

| @indiablooms | Feb 20, 2026, at 10:30 pm

In a major legal setback for President Donald Trump, the US Supreme Court on Friday struck down his sweeping tariffs, ruling that he exceeded his authority by imposing them under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The 6-3 decision, authored by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, emphasized that the Constitution grants Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs.

The Court noted that if Congress had intended to give the president such authority under IEEPA, it would have done so explicitly.

Joining Roberts in the majority were three liberal justices and three conservative justices, while Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito dissented, media reports said.

In April 2025, Trump announced “reciprocal” tariffs on imports from many countries, claiming they were essential to protect US economic security and address trade deficits.

Small businesses and several US states challenged the tariffs, arguing that the administration was turning emergency powers into a “blank cheque” for tariff-making.

By December 2025, the Treasury had collected over $133 billion from these tariffs, and the Congressional Budget Office estimated their long-term economic impact could reach $3 trillion over the next decade.

Companies like Costco have already filed lawsuits seeking refunds.

Legal experts say the ruling reinforces Congress’s exclusive authority to impose taxes and marks a significant limitation on presidential economic powers.

However, the administration may attempt to reimpose tariffs through other legal avenues in the future.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.