January 16, 2026 12:36 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Major blow to Mamata! SC stays FIRs, flags state meddling in central probe as ‘serious issue’ | Supreme Court snub shocks Vijay’s Jana Nayagan, release now in deep trouble | Trump tariff bomb on Iran trade: Tharoor flags existential crisis for Indian exporters | 'Mobocracy in court?': SC explodes over Calcutta HC chaos in ED vs Mamata showdown | Dalal Street on hold! Maharashtra civic polls pull the plug on market action | Big blow to TMC! Calcutta High Court dismisses case against ED in I-PAC raid row | 10-minute delivery dead! Govt crackdown forces Blinkit, Swiggy and Zomato to backtrack after gig workers revolt | US tariff threats put India-Iran trade at risk – Chabahar Port becomes the high-stakes battleground! | Sensex slides 250 points as defence stocks bleed, Zomato parent Eternal soars | Markets rally big after US envoy calls India White House’s ‘most important ally’

Scottish court rules Jonson's decision to suspend parliament not illegitimate: Reports

| @indiablooms | Sep 04, 2019, at 05:35 pm

Moscow, Sep 4 (Sputnik/UNI) A judge of the court in Edinburgh, which has been leading the case of UK opposition lawmakers challenging the decision of Prime Minister Boris Johnson to suspend the parliament almost immediately prior to when the United Kingdom is due to leave the European Union, decided that the prorogation does not contradict the law, media reported on Wednesday.

A judge at the highest court in Scotland has ruled Johnson's decision to suspend parliament is not a matter for the courts and does not contravene the rule of law, Sky News said.

Johnson has been clear about his determination to deliver Brexit by the October 31 deadline, with or without a deal, despite there being a strong opposition to the no-deal scenario in the Commons. Last Wednesday, he asked Queen Elizabeth II to suspend parliament until October 14, to which she consented.

The effect of this will likely be that those lawmakers who seek to stop a no-deal Brexit will not have enough time to do so. A group of 75 opposition members of parliament eventually decided to challenge the prorogation in court.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.