Director Abhishek Sharma addresses Censor Board in an open letter
"How are you doing? I hope you are recovering well from the sudden internal revamp that was caused by the identity crisis faced by some previous members of yours. I don't blame them for feeling sidelined as these days a lot of unofficial organisations are doing your job. We have political and religious groups banning films free of cost," Sharma wrote in his letter to the Board.
"We as filmmakers don't have to pay any processing fees to them, nor do we have to wait in the long ques in order to get moral lessons from these esteemed people. What more, we don't even have to show them our films. They have a great censory perception (pun intended) as they can decide if a film is bad or dangerous for a society without even viewing it!," wrote he.
The filmmaker who directed movies like 'Tere Bin Laden' and 'The Shaukeens' tagged Censor Board as the 'sole antagonist' in the lives of the filmmakers.
In the wake of social media buzzing with feeds from various Bollywood celebrities denouncing the Censor Board's decision, Abhishek's open letter criticizing the Board and its decision has made it to the internet.
Following is the full letter of Abhishek Sharma:
Dear Censor Board,
How are you doing? I hope you are recovering well from the sudden internal revamp that was caused by the identity crisis faced by some previous members of yours. I don't blame them for feeling sidelined as these days a lot of unofficial organisations are doing your job. We have political and religious groups banning films free of cost. We as filmmakers don't have to pay any processing fees to them, nor do we have to wait in the long ques in order to get moral lessons from these esteemed people. What more, we don't even have to show them our films. They have a great censory perception (pun intended) as they can decide if a film is bad or dangerous for a society without even viewing it!
They are definitely doing a far better and efficient job of protecting our society from crazy artists than you ever did. From raising objections over factual errors in fictional novels to roasting comedians who dare to roast other comedians, these self appointed contractors of morality cover the entire spectrum of art & culture. Nowadays even National Governments like that of North Korea and terrorist organisations like Al-Qaeda are contributing magnificently to the cause of firing artists. Well, literally in the case of Al-Qaeda.
In these times your existence has surely become redundant. You clear a film, yet it gets banned (Vishwaroopam). You ban a film, yet it gets released (Messenger of God). What's the point if no one respects your judgement? This calls for serious action. You should stand up for your exclusive right to defend the immature audience of this country. I suggest you start with banning the act of banning by unauthorized groups or individuals. We as filmmakers prostrate before you to become the sole antagonist in our lives as we dare to exercise our freedom of expression. It will be lot easier to deal with one entity rather than a countless guardians of culture and morality.
However if you cannot achieve such an exclusive status, please stop living a pretentious life. You have no reason to exist on tax payer's money if you can't be the final authority on what's good for him and what's not. In such a scenario you can still survive by being an advisor, a guide. You can just rate films without censoring them and let the people decide if they want to watch them. Don't worry about us, the filmmakers, as we will still have the political parties, religious heads, rogue governments and trigger happy terrorists to deal with!
Wish you a speedy recovery and intense introspection!
Yours' Sincerely
Abhishek Sharma
(Censor Survivor)
Support Our Journalism
We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism
IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.