November 22, 2024 11:41 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
PM Modi bestowed Dominica's highest award at India-CARICOM Summit | 69-year-old Delhi man, a St. Stephen's alumnus, arrested for conning govt officers by posing as ex-IPS | 'Baseless': Adani Group denies US charges of bribery and fraud against Gautam Adani | AAP's first list of candidates for Delhi polls feature six turncoats | PM Modi is incapable to arrest Gautam Adani: Rahul Gandhi after tycoon charged with bribery and fraud in the US
'Clear mistake' by umpires gave England the World Cup: Simon Taufel
Image Credit: @cricketworldcup on Twitter

'Clear mistake' by umpires gave England the World Cup: Simon Taufel

| @indiablooms | 15 Jul 2019, 02:04 pm

London, July 15 (IBNS): Former international umpire and Simon Taufel has admitted a "clear mistake" that enabled England to win its first World Cup, a report in Fox Cricket said.

Taufel is also a member of the panel that formulates cricket rules.

He said England were awarded six runs instead of five when a throw struck Ben Stokes' bat.

When England needed nine runs from the final three balls, New Zealander Martin Guptill's throw hit the outstretched bat of a diving Ben Stokes, sending the ball to the boundary.

The play was awarded six overthrows — four for the resulting boundary and two for the batsmen running between wickets.

According to Taufel, a five-time ICC Umpire of the Year winner, five runs should have been awarded instead of giving England an extra run and keeping Stokes on strike.

“They (England) should have been awarded five runs, not six,” the report quoted him as saying.


Image Credit: @cricketworldcup on Twitter
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.