Nepal Politics Kathmandu: The dissolution of the House of Representatives of parliament has put democracy at risk in Nepal, said Nepal's former prime minister and leader of opposition Sher Bahadur Deuba, whose claim to form the government was rejected by President Bidya Devi Bhandari on 22 May. Last month, Bhandari had dissolved the lower house of parliament despite getting support letters from a majority of MPs.
“The refusal to receive an application to claim the prime ministerial post signed by a majority of 149 members of the lower house as per the president's call in this regard was an attack on democratic norms and values,” Deuba was quoted as saying by The Himalayan Times newspaper during a meeting of opposition leaders on Thursday in Nepal.
Deuba, the leader of the Nepali Congress, the biggest among opposition parties, had formed a coalition of five parties, including a communist party headed by former prime minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal, and a faction of Prime Minister Oli’s party headed by disgruntled leader Madhav Nepal.
Soon after the dissolution, opposition parties moved the apex court--for the second time in the last five months - challenging the move. Over two dozens petitions are pending the country’s top court in the matter. The court is hearing the matter on daily basis.
Defending the move in the court, the government argued that the president’s action to dissolve the house can’t be reviewed by the court. Legal experts, though, contest the claim. There is enough precedence, they claim, where the top court not only reviewed decisions by the president but also passed orders overturning them.
Significantly, earlier in February, the court had reinstated the house, overturning the president’s December decision to dissolve the house.
Support Our Journalism
We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism
IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.
