April 19, 2024 13:09 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Maldives opposition demands President Muizzu's impeachment over leaked reports alleging corruption by him | AAP claims conspiracy to kill Arvind Kejriwal after mango eating row | India successfully tests Indigenous Technology Subsonic Cruise Missile | Telangana missionary school vandalised after students questioned over saffron attire | Shilpa Shetty's husband Raj Kundra's properties attached by ED in Bitcoin scam
Hush money: Is Trump contradicting himself?

Hush money: Is Trump contradicting himself?

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 23 Aug 2018, 06:30 am

Washington, Aug 23 (IBNS): Denying an account by his former lawyer Michael Cohen pertaining to 'hush money', US President Donald Trump has said that it was him who paid the two women he had an alleged affair with and not the former.

Testifying before a court under oath, Cohen had said that he made the payments on behalf of the US President on the latter's command.

Under US campaign laws, paying someone from the election fund to keep discomforting stories a secret is treated as a transgression.

Following the testament, the court found Cohen guilty of tax evasion, bank fraud and campaign finance violations.

However, Trump's recent admission, where he said "They came from me. And I tweeted about it. But they did not come out of the campaign," seems to contradict his previous statement, in which he had denied such knowledge.

The two women in question are former Playboy model Karen McDougal and adult entertainer Stormy Daniels.

Cohen told the court that he paid the two at the direction of the candidate, referring to the US President and added that it was paid in order to influence the election. He had reportedly paid Daniels $130,000, which Trump denied having any knowledge about.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.