June 27, 2026 10:21 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ram Mandir Trust chief Champat Rai resigns as alleged donation siphoning row escalates | Ram Mandir fund row deepens: 8 arrested days after BJP called allegations 'false narrative' | 'Who tied the hands of CBI?': Calcutta HC on RG Kar case; victim's mother, now BJP MLA, says she is 'deeply disturbed' | Construction comes to a standstill at nearly 700 Kolkata projects after Taratala warehouse tragedy kills 15 | World Cup shocker! Ecuador stun Germany 2-1, storm into Round of 32 | Iran-US conflict: Cargo vessel hit near Strait of Hormuz, UN agency pauses evacuation operations | Amazon's massive India bet! Andy Jassy announces $48 billion investment after meeting PM Modi | Taratala warehouse collapse: Death toll climbs to 8, five arrested as SIT launches probe | Oil prices crash, IndiGo takes off! Aviation and fuel stocks emerge as biggest winners | Passport is a travel document, not conclusive proof of citizenship: MEA
Bihar
Representative image/ credit: Pixabay

65 dead due to toxic liquor consumption in Bihar, Nitish Kumar refuses to give compensation

| @indiablooms | Dec 17, 2022, at 03:42 am

Patna/IBNS: At least 65 people have been confirmed dead at Chapra in Bihar's Saran district due to the consumption of toxic liquor, media reports said Friday.

The tragedy, the biggest since Bihar went dry more than six years ago, is the latest in a long list of such deaths in the state ever since Chief Minister Nitish Kumar imposed prohibition in 2016.

The government, which is an alliance of Janata Dal-United (JD-U) and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), is facing massive protests by the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in the Assembly and outside over alleged laxity in implementing prohibition.

Speaking in the state assembly, Kumar reiterated his stand that there would be no compensation who died after drinking illegal alcohol.

The number of people drinking toxic liquor in Bihar, both before and after prohibition, is low, he claimed, adding that in other places where there is no prohibition, people are still dying after drinking toxic liquor.

"Madhya Pradesh is on top. Where is this not happening -- Haryana, Uttar Pradesh. Go anywhere and it's the same story. When they died of toxic liquor, we are saying you'll die if you drink that. Why don't you publish when they die in the same in other places? I will reiterate everywhere, if someone is speaking in favour of alcohol, it'll never be to your benefit," Kumar said.

He then trained his guns towards the BJP, implying that the media disproportionately covers such tragedies in opposition-ruled states.

"In the state where the bridge collapsed, just one news was published and then nothing. When the same happened in Bengal, it ran for so long. We will popularise it more, that you'll die if you drink alcohol. Those who died after drinking, we will give them compensation? It's not going to happen," he added.

Kumar had refused to give compensation to the families of those killed and said people should be "more vigilant" when the state anyway has prohibition.

He had even furiously screamed "sharabi ho tum (you are a drunk)" at the opposition BJP on Dec 14 as he faced protests in the Assembly.

The National Human Rights Commission has issued notices to the Bihar government and the state's police chief.

The sale and consumption of alcohol were completely banned in Bihar in April 2016, though its "implementation has been patchy," the NHRC observed in a statement.

In August, in a case in the same district, five people died after drinking toxic liquor. The police are reportedly looking for more who have been taken sick; they may have gone into hiding to avoid interrogation as liquor is banned in Bihar.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.