July 05, 2026 08:32 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Why can't citizens protest against the government? They are being made slaves by slapping cases': Bombay HC slams Mumbai Police, quashes activist's externment | 'First he cheats on me...': Siya Goyal's old pub video goes viral amid probe into fiancé Ketan Agarwal's alleged murder | Ronaldo's goal, Ramos' last-gasp winner send Portugal past Croatia, set up Spain clash | India-US trade deal almost done! Piyush Goyal hints at breakthrough | Ram Mandir donation scam: Champat Rai points finger at his own driver | PM Modi welcomes Japanese PM Sanae Takaichi as India-Japan ties enter a new era | 'Not an isolated incident': India slams Pakistan after 125-year-old historic Gurdwara is demolished | Ram Mandir donation theft: Six accused were employed by Varanasi-based security firm, probe reveals | Ayodhya Ram Temple donation theft: Probe says majority of money was allegedly stolen during Kumbh Mela | Commercial LPG price slashed by Rs 183.50 from July 1; check new rates in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai
Tandav row
Image Credit: Amazon Prime Twitter Handle

Allahabad HC rejects protection to Amazon top executive from arrest in 'Tanadav' row

| @indiablooms | Feb 26, 2021, at 03:13 am

Lucknow/IBNS: A single-judge bench of Allahabad High Court has rejected an anticipatory bail plea filed by Amazon Prime India's top executive Aparna Purohit over an  FIR filed by Uttar Pradesh Police in Noida against the makers of the controversial web series 'Tandav'.

Purohit has been accused of promoting religious enmity and defiling a place of worship.

She has protection from arrest in a second, separate case filed by the police in Lucknow. Another judge in the Allahabad High Court has extended that protection till March 9 three days ago.

Rejecting Purohit's anticipatory bail in the Noida case, Justice Siddharth said, "The conduct of the applicant shows that she has scant respect for the law of the land and her conduct further disentitles her to any relief from this court."

Justice Siddharth said, "The fact remains that the applicant had not been vigilant and has acted irresponsibly making her open to criminal prosecution in permitting streaming of a movie which is against the fundamental rights of the majority of citizens of this country and therefore, her fundamental right of life and liberty cannot be protected by grant of anticipatory bail to her in the exercise of discretionary powers of this court."

The court also observed that there is a "growing tendency" in the Hindi film industry to subvert the image of historical and mythological personalities.

"If not curbed in time, it may have disastrous consequences for the Indian social, religious and communal order. There appears to be a design behind such acts on the part of people who just give a disclaimer in all the films and depict things in movies which are really religiously, socially and communally offensive in nature."

Earlier, the Supreme Court last month refused to provide protection against arrest to the team of 'Tandav' after at least three FIRs were filed in Uttar Pradesh over the content which allegedly insults the Hindu gods and goddesses.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.